Sigh. Another feminist site that is happily content to paint us as women-haters and to denigrate the victimization of the falsely accused by pretending they are "rare." Don't take my word for it. Visit her site.
Here's what she wrote (followed by my comment):
The Rare False Accusation Part 3
I am thinking about the comment, left yesterday--
"Would you care to furnish objectively verifiable stats on false rape claims, as I've done twice in the past several days, instead of positing self-righteous blather?
I thought not.
Pierce Harlan
False Rape Society"
And I'm wondering this:
Why do these men HATE so much? It is ironic that they are angry at women who are angry at men for committing so much rape. Now, I have never been a GROUP HATER-- that is, i don't know if it was the way i was raised or a biological/personality sort of thing, but as much as i deplore (and get sick over) the crimes of violence against women, children, and men, i have not found myself Hating Men (the usual perpetrators). And by the way, the Primary Source of violence against men is also from Men.
But on this False Accu Site i find that 1) they are mad at (and poke fun with degrading and insulting language) women, feminists, etc. for supposedly being man haters due to rape.2) Then they take up that mantle and decide to model that behavior; that is, to become women-haters because some small percentage of women have wronged them in an egregious way.3.they then expand the hatred to anyone who works to alleviate the circles of pain caused by sexual assault.
Sadly, I am sure there is a need for a good supportive, truthful, educational site about false accusations. Too bad this one is so draped and saturated with anger, bitterness, and bile. I guess most groups have to go through, like an immature child, the tantrums of Justice Denied. It is hard to stay honorable, peacefilled, grown-up and loving after being attacked, isn't it?
and let me restate:-- the reason false reports --rare as they are--are so HORRIBLE is that the CRIME is so horrible.
My comment:
In my experience, some rape feminists choose to paint our blog in the manner you suggest because they are offended by the facts that we have the temerity to point out. They are also offended that we have the audacity to stand up to one college newspaper after the next that parrot sexual assault counselors who suggest that false rape claims are a "myth." They don't dare argue facts with us, mind you. They know that's an argument they can't win. Some of them have publicly wished for me to be brutally raped. Most simply retreat to defamation, by labeling us misogynists -- you see, we MUST hate women, because we cite objectively verifiable fact that shows that -- HORRORS! -- some women do lie about rape. Ah, mustn't let the truth interfere with a good feminist victim metanarrative. So it's "You are evil, we are good, and that's the end of the discussion."
That sort of ham-handed rhetorical trick might work in high school, or in a Women's Studies class, but we are too weary, too jaded, and lightyears beyond that. All due respect.
I recently stirred up a hornet's nest on my blog (believe it or not, I get more angry mail from true misogynists than from radical feminists -- who, ahem, are too timid to write to me directly, most won't even link to me) when I revealed how much mail I get from actual rape victims who support what we do. Surprising? Not to me. Their primary enemies are -- you guessed it -- false rape accusers, and they know how much damage false accusers do to actual rape victims. Too bad feminist rape advocates don't seem to care about that at all (and I mean, not at all). Who'd have thunk it! The people most affected by rape don't buy into the politicization that rejects anything I have to say at my blog, merely because I say it. They hate rape, as do I, and they hate false rape accusers, as do I. Too bad the rape advocates couldn't care less about the latter.
I have no control over my commentators and do not tolerate painting an enttire gender in a negative light. Read my comments policy. "Women" are not false accusers; SOME women are. Just as "men" are not rapists; SOME men are.
But you are correct about one thing: we are in a war with a nasty strain of feminism that insists false rape claims are a myth, and we aren't happy about it. Too bad our opponents are content to spread half-truths and outright lies, and to paint us as something we are not, rather than deal with us honestly. Rather than debate facts. Rather than JOIN WITH US so we can all eradicate both rape AND false rape claims. I've made that offer repeatedly but no one has ever responded to me.
Helping rape victims is wonderful; fomenting false accusations by suggestion evey rape claim must be true (which means the male who was accused MUST be a rapist), and denigrating the victimization of the falsely accused by pretending they are a myth, are morally grotesque.
Pierce Harlan
FALSE RAPE SOCIETY
March 6, 2010 3:38 PM
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Feminist blog about False Rape Society: 'Why do these men HATE so much?'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
47 comments:
Rape hysteria gives the gender / raunch culture feminists alot of power.
"the reason false reports --rare as they are--are so HORRIBLE is that the CRIME is so horrible."
She is actually correct - in a sense.
But not the sense that she meant.
Real rape, e.g. traditional rape, is indeed, so horrible.
And it is because that crime is so horrible, that men who are falsely accused, are subject to treatment which is so horrible.
To be honest, this woman seems to be all over the place.
"It is ironic that they are angry at women who are angry at men for committing so much rape. Now, I have never been a GROUP HATER"
Herp a derp derp. 'Men commit so much rape'. 'I don't judge people as groups'.
What a moron. She can't even get her own point of view straight.
And seriously, anyone asking why men hate feminists, is like punching someone in the face then criticising them for bleeding.
Rest assured, sweetie, all hyperbole aside: I don't hate women. I hate feminists. So should everyone.
Really, take it as a HUMONGOUS compliment...
Gender feminism is 95% white middle class liberals. The only black males they will let in are black homo-sexual males.
I'd also like everyone to consider this particular SERMON OF FILTH, in which yet another feminist preaches about our moral shortcomings, in light of my post from earlier today.
http://remasculation.blogspot.com/2010/03/sermons-of-filth.html
First they ignore you
then they fight you,
Then you win.
Also, it should pass nobody by, the pure irony of a FEMINIST asking why somebody else is a 'hater'.
Maybe it's because hate bounces back. Derp a derp derp
Gender / raunch feminists gain alot of power and sway over American politics by promulgating faulty and inflammatory misinformation.
Isn't the definition of Hate speech.."faulty and inflammatory misinformation"???
What are these upper white middle class...Gender/ Raunch nazi's trying to force onto America??
The person who runs that blog is a "rape counselor" at K-State. In other words, this person has a vested interest in ensuring that as many events as possible are declared or described as rape. She'd be out of a job otherwise.
"If you ever want to debate facts instead of relying on your serene self-righeous ipse dixit...."
LMFAO!!!
I'm sure most of the people who post on this forum would not want to see innocent women jailed for crimes they never committed, yet most of those on the other side of the argument don't care about convictions of innocent men or seem to regard them as necessary collateral damage in the greater cause of protecting women.
But hey, we are all a bunch of evil hate-mongers and they are the noble enlightened ones bravely fighting for a better world. Whatever!
You know, honey, if it makes you feel better about yourself, then you go right on believing that. I would hate to destroy your fragile sense of self worth.
I like the term someone – I don’t recall who – at The Spearhead has been using to refer to the feminist’s propensity for making contradictory claims: "cognitive dissonance".
If you really want to get some more people to visit this site put some of those awesome comments on the biggest news sites you can find.
I bet a lot of people do not even know about how common FRA are until they look at this site or read on of your posts.
Also a few youtube videos on FRA might help.
I just wish I owned a huge tv station so I could give you lots of air time.
I'm sorry my comment above was meant for Ben Roethlisberger thread!
Gender / Raunch pigs talk about such things as forced labor for men/boys while the gender /Raunch uber-class harvests the fruits; and we simply talk about holding women accountable for their false rape accusations, and all the sudden we are haters.
It may very well be the Gender / Raunch community that are the real haters. From wat i have seen, The gender / Raunch crowd is 95% white middle class, and they only accept minorities if those minorities are staunch/Raunch.
Define "raunch" and "raunch culture" so that people can understand what you are referring to. Give examples.
Hey snark -- and others-- You mis-label me; you think you know where i come from but You Do Not. If and when you see me for who i am, i will smile and be nice to you because life is too short to be mean and fight. I am going to move on, forgiving you all your insults to me because you are jumping to FALSE conclusions and because it is really hard to be a good Christian Lion-hearted Man in the world today. I wish you all good things.
and by the way, just because "men" tend to do the assaulting, whether in prison or out, doesn't mean that one has attitudes toward all men.
I would be your best defender, if you knew who you were talking to. one quick question, archivist- do you and your readers want to be smarter and snappier and wittier at insulting than everyone, or do you want to work honorably toward change and Truth?
"do you and your readers want to be smarter and snappier and wittier at insulting than everyone, or do you want to work honorably toward change and Truth?"
Hey Katy, who said we can't Have It All?
I'm pretty sure we can handle both - the truth and the wit.
All that, without needing the awesome defence power of feminists who misrepresent our purpose and minimise the issue we draw attention to.
This post is the gift that keeps on giving.
"Would you care to furnish objectively verifiable stats on false rape claims, as I've done twice in the past several days, instead of positing self-righteous blather?
I thought not.
Pierce Harlan
False Rape Society"
I like how her response to this was to NOT bring objectively verifiable stats to the table, but to indulge in MORE self-righteous blather.
Rather than bring objectively verifiable stats to argue against you with evidence, she shifts the argument to "OMG why are you so angry at me."
Like a goddamn child.
Still, we're used to this kind of tactic from feminists. See here.
"archivist- do you and your readers want to be smarter and snappier and wittier at insulting than everyone, or do you want to work honorably toward change and Truth?"
Anonymous here....
I've already posted two, 2-part posts on your GoodDog blog that outline my position. I know that I am on the side of truth, as correct and complete as I know it to be. To me, as I have said before, "the conflicts caused by misinformation can end when everyone acknowledges rational, authoritative sources of information; when everyone has respect for critical thinking and fair and just treatment; and when there is truth and accuracy in reporting." What you perceive to be witty, smart, snappy or insulting is a response to those who make comments here or about FRS that have nothing to do with reason or accountability. We falsely accused get especially grumpy when we come across comments and entire websites that are not: clear, accurate, precise, relevant, deep, broad, significant, logical, and fair in regard to false rape issues. So don't take it personally! And yes there are individuals who embrace being victims here at FRS. The difference between those here and elsewhere is that those who perceive themselves as victims here have not been able to institutionalize their "victimhood" into unjust laws and unfair treatment (nor do they want to). In spite of the irony, slights, and biting satire that we sometimes engage in here, we are actually on the same side. Say anything you want, just be willing to back it up with a preponderance of objective, observable evidence (which is more in line with "the TRUTH").
"archivist- do you and your readers want to be smarter and snappier and wittier at insulting than everyone, or do you want to work honorably toward change and Truth?"
I am sorry, but I don't think I can talk seriously about working toward change with someone who repeatedly denigrates the victimization of the falsely accused by saying false rape claims are rare. They are not; you are wrong.
If you are "insulted" by someone because he advocates for the truth in an effective manner, then the problem is you.
Pierce Harlan
She says that "These men hate women who men because of rape!" -- but that's not true. We hate FALSE RAPE ACCUSERS, get it? Not rape victims, but SCUM WHO ARE LYING.
This woman apparently can't conceive of why we would get upset when so many innocent men are steamrolled by a dishonest, gullible legal system, or why we might oppose the system that incarcerates more men -- especially minority men -- than any other country IN THE WORLD.
She is another clueless feminist who thinks that sending innocent men to prison ain't no thang, but she's wrong.
hello! i LOVE this blog! iam : http://www.twitter.com/stopthisempire
follow me on twitter! i have posted links to this and other anti misandrist sites, happy to be here. keep up the great work!
"Rest assured, sweetie, all hyperbole aside: I don't hate women. I hate feminists. So should everyone."
Is it so wrong to want equal rights for women? That is really all feminists mean. Sure, there are some radicals out there, but why put all of us in a bunch. Is it so wrong to want a world without rape? I think what you mean to say is that you don't hate women when she's making your dinner and making you feel like a king while you are belittling her, but when she takes a stance against violence and freedom from oppression, then you hate her because she becomes a free woman.
I was out celebrating our town's annual Fake Paddy's Day celebration and it amazed me how pig-like men can be. I saw a woman who was so drunk who was being thrown around between 5 guys in public, who obviously knew that she couldn't control herself at one point. They were more sober so they should have been the ones stopping this. Of course, being men, why would they. "She's just sending a message, right?" WRONG.
Feminist-hating men-
If you have ever read the Kansas Constitution or any of the laws of Kansas and read up on consent, you would know that it is easy to not even put yourself in the position of being accused of rape. Why would you want to belittle a person who should have the same rights as you just to have the satisfaction of "getting laid" or what not.
If you have ever been a victim of any kind of sexual assault, there should be no need to even put any kind of political context into the argument unless you are saying that the world still isn't fair for women (in a sense that we still have to sacrifice daily an nightly activities to keep us from being victims of the most vile crime out there).
Thank you and have a great day
KTSurvivor
"and by the way, just because "men" tend to do the assaulting, whether in prison or out, doesn't mean that one has attitudes toward all men."
Nice straw man there, but no-one is suggesting that anyone is a man-hater for simply stating the obvious truth that men commit most rapes.
What we object to is the cavalier and dismissive attitude towards men falsely accused or convicted of rape and other crimes. It is this contempt for basic human rights, due process, and the presumption-of-innocence that is objectionable.
Oh, and instead of wasting time and energy on insulting feminists and a great woman who is trying to protect the girls from K-State from pighead men and the justice system that screws us over all the time, why don't you use your time more wisely and start educating the men and teach them the laws of consent. That way the poor little victimized pre-rapists know the rules and don't have to put themselves in that position at all.
Also, Why don't you ever look at the positive things that have been accomplished by feminists? Being a woman, yes, I am a little biased, but without feminists, our world would still be bleak. Do you know what it is like to not be able to trust men? Trust me, we didn't come up with that by ourselves. It does suck when a man is falsely accused, but luckily, that is what we have rape kits for and in order for the case to even get to trial to send a man to prison, the case against him would have to contain enough evidence to make it a strong case, which means he would probably be guilty anyways.
AND, in defense to women in their right mind, no logical, sensible, woman with morals or self-respect would ever go forward and falsely accuse someone of rape. I think you are just mixed up about what rape can mean.
KTSurvivor:
I am founder of this blog, which is the world's leading site dedicated to giving voice to persons falsely accused of rape. We have innumerable readers who were falsely accused, and for you to come to this site and blithely accuse us of misogyny (yes, you did this by deigning to lecture us about how oppressed women are), is inappropriate and triggering. It's as if one of us waltzed onto a site read by rape survivors and insisted that rape is "rare" and not a serious problem.
I am not going to waste my time summarizing the overwhelming, irrefutable, and undisputed findings of every single serious study ever conducted on the prevalence of false rape claims (trust me, I am familiar with all of them). Every one of them shows that, by any measure, false rape claims are a serious problem.
Judging by your smarmy comment, any such effort would be wasted on you.
Kindly take your misandry to some radical feminist site that happily ignores the facts and denigrates the victimization of the falsely accused by insisting false claims are a myth. Their views, and yours, are nothing short of morally grotesque. (Trust me, I could give a several hour lecture on the law of consent. Newsflash: being falsely accused is easy in Kansas, and every other state. But I'm sure you don't care about that. You would do well to spend a week or two reading through the true news accounts about false rape claims, and the studies cited here on this site before opining on this subject again.)
Go and tell your like-minded man-haters how awful we are, and how much we hate women because we happen to not like it when people are falsely accused. Aren't we typical male pigs!
Oh, and by the way, we hate rape, too. It is a pity that radical feminists like you couldn't give a flying fuck about men and boys falsely accused. Don't deny it. You know it's true.
All due respect, ma'am.
PIERCE HARLAN
Readers: KT Survivor is now banned. Allowing further ill-informed, childish comments from her isn't fair to our falsely accused readers. She's inappropriately used our forum to spread her hatred. I decided to allow her comments because we need to be reminded that persons like this exist -- they really do deny the reality of false rape claims, and to use her inanity as a teaching moment. She strikes me as someone not sufficiently mature or intelligent to realize she just stepped into a gun battle armed only with a plastic dagger.
"I was out celebrating our town's annual Fake Paddy's Day celebration and it amazed me how pig-like men can be. I saw a woman who was so drunk who was being thrown around between 5 guys in public, who obviously knew that she couldn't control herself at one point. They were more sober so they should have been the ones stopping this."
Well, it's good to know that 40 years of feminist social engineering has had its desired effect of improving male behavior.
The thing is that people often become what is expected of them. A generation or more of men have grown up in a society where they are constantly taught that men are vile and worthless. So eventually they say 'hey, so be it!'.
It's really surprising that if you take away people's rights, families, dignity and purpose in life, it doesn't really encourage them to behave better. Who would of thought it!
I am cross-posting a reply I made for the benefit of our readers.
Anonymous said at http://marysbeagooddogblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/rare-false-accusation-part-3.html:
@KT Survivor
""Please tell that to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela. Do you also consider them to be immature people who were throwing tantrums? We falsely accused have more in common with the movements headed by those leaders than you can ever imagine."
Mary never said anything about these men throwing tantrums. If you are going to attempt to mock her, then why not get it right? There really isn't any need to bring up these men in this ridiculous debate anyways, not that Mary's supporters are trying debate."
The comment was in my reply to her statement:
"I guess most groups have to go through, like an immature child, the tantrums of Justice Denied. It is hard to stay honorable, peacefilled, grown-up and loving after being attacked, isn't it?"
KT, I am definitely not mocking her. You need to take my comment in context to understand what I am saying. If Mary is saying "most groups" have to "go through tantrums of Justice Denied" Justice was denied to Dr. King, Gandhi, and Mandela and to the groups whom they represented. So, my question to her is legitimate. False rape accusations are a civil rights issue (for women and men). The legal system has changed to protect women at the expense of men and denied men the right of confronting their accusers per the 6th Amendment of the US Constitution: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." Further the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution has been trampled by rape related legislation: "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Unfortunately, this is not a new issue. Read
Theodore Roosevelt's 1906 State of the Union Address:
http://www.infoplease.com/t/hist/state-of-the-union/118.html
If we substitute racial terms with gender terms, much of what President Roosevelt expressed in his State of The Union speech in 1906 we advocate on FRS.
Over 100 years later, we continue to deal with racial and gender prejudice and mob mentality, but now our problems stem not only from the opprobrium of those who rush to judgment (including you, some of those at FRS, gender-feminists, and mens' rights activists too) but also from the very corrective measures originally designed to bring equality and end prejudice. To afford the rights of one group at the expense of the rights of another group is a violation of our Constitutional protections and guarantees. False Rape Accusations are now the bane of all men, regardless of race and age. This is a civil rights issue and I think invoking the names of King, Gandhi, and Mandela is entirely appropriate when asking for clarification from Mary. The falsely accused have much in common with the followers of those great men.
Let me make something clear: I am happy to talk about pretty much everything here, but we don't entertain self-righteous blather that denies the seriousness of false rape claims by pretending, by lying, by misrepresenting the prevalence of false rape claims. Off limits here.
It's been a blathery day, Archivist.
Some reading material to wash off the blather:
http://www.mkgandhi.org/
http://www.mlkonline.net/speeches.html/
http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/mandela/
Hey Mzzzzz. Dumbass,
http://equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com/2009/09/feminism-and-sex.html
Apparently you didn't get the memo that feminism is about hating men. Now you know, stop acting like an infant.
"Is it so wrong to want a world without rape?"
Is it so wrong to want a world without rape or false rape accusations? Apparently you have a problem with the latter - apparently we're just "angry" and "backlashing."
"I think what you mean to say is that you don't hate women when she's making your dinner and making you feel like a king while you are belittling her, but when she takes a stance against violence and freedom from oppression, then you hate her because she becomes a free woman."
What a bunch of bullshit. I want women to get and stay out of my life. Who do you think you are to make these assumptions about me? What a narrow-minded bigot you just showed yourself to be.
By the way, we have plenty of women right here who take a stand against violence and oppression, and I think they're great.
"I was out celebrating our town's annual Fake Paddy's Day celebration and it amazed me how pig-like men can be."
And it constantly amazes me how pig-like feminists can be. Making generalisations about an entire sex, then denying your bigotry? Pathetic!
"Why would you want to belittle a person who should have the same rights as you just to have the satisfaction of "getting laid" or what not."
What ARE you talking about? We're objecting to women who LIE ABOUT BEING RAPED, not women who HAVE BEEN RAPED. How is this so hard for your to grasp?
"why don't you use your time more wisely and start educating the men and teach them the laws of consent."
Oh right, of course - consent. It's consent so long as a woman decides it's consent. If she regrets the sex after consenting to it, it was no longer consensual. Yeah, we are educating men about this, don't worry. We're doing what we can to let men know that they are not safe having consensual sex with women.
"That way the poor little victimized pre-rapists know the rules and don't have to put themselves in that position at all."
What the fuck is wrong with you? We're talking about MEN FALSELY ACCUSED OF RAPE, not RAPISTS. Why are you so unable to see the difference? Perhaps because you're a bigot? A hateful, misandrist bigot?
You just showed your misandry with that last comment. Trivialising and making fun of innocent men who have had their lives ruined, some of whom have sat in prison for decades on a woman's word alone.
You are a sickening piece of shit.
"Also, Why don't you ever look at the positive things that have been accomplished by feminists?"
LOL!
Name ONE.
ALL that has been accomplished by feminists is a net increase in hatred between the sexes.
But I won't play that game. Oh no. I choose to hate, not women, but FEMINISTS, and I invite all women in their right minds to do the same.
Pierce, thankyou for banning the infant. She was grating on my nerves.
Dear KTSurvivor,
Oh, and instead of wasting time and energy on insulting feminists and a great woman who is trying to protect the girls from K-State from pighead men and the justice system that screws us over all the time, why don't you use your time more wisely and start educating the men and teach them the laws of consent. That way the poor little victimized pre-rapists know the rules and don't have to put themselves in that position at all.
etc
I was at a board meeting a week or so back. One of the other members, an immensely talented, respected and active woman throughout my entire city and beyond, mentioned "feminists". What really floored me was the manner in which she used the word. Such venom!
By the way that board I refer to is running a rape crisis and counselling centre and forms part part of a primarily govt operated/funded network.
I remain floored.
Lift your game girl. You're not helping.
KTS Survivor's post reads like a field guide to feminists tactics and stereotypes: a woman was drunk and being "passed" around between five men because they are somehow responsible for her being drunk; the goal of the criminal justice system is a utopian "world without rape" which has never existed, and any methods are justified until it does; screaming "equality!" when in reality feminism is all about lies and special privileges.
We have seen these tactics countless times, and will continue seeing them. Feminists are all too predictable.
While late in this thread, an item related (in that CU is in the Big 12 Conference, along with KU, a post about which seems to have got this bloggers attention WRT this site):
CU sex-crime warning map confuses the issue
By Yesenia Robles
The Denver Post
Posted: 03/08/2010 03:00:47 PM MST
Updated: 03/08/2010 03:02:51 PM MST
A new interactive campus crime map on CU-Boulder's police website reports that 10 sex offenses occurred on campus between August 2009 and March 2010.
But CU police spokeswoman, Molly Bosley said Monday the information on the map is misleading.
Of the 10 sex offenses reported online, one is a rape case. An array of charges get classified as sex offenses online, including indecent exposure or fondling.
"If you look at the statistics, there were four rape cases in 2009, and seven in 2008. So it's actually decreasing," Bosley said.
She also said the misleading number of sex offenses is also a result of multiple charges in any one incident showing up as separate incidents.
"We really are going to have to look at how we present that information online," Bosley said.
The sole sex offense that is a rape is still being investigated, although student Joshua Newton has been charged in the Feb. 17 case.
So, at my Alma Mater, there were all of 4 rapes last year out of about 30,000 students (~17,000 women). And, in a non-rape sex assault this year, multiple charges were filed, yet each charge counted as if a separate incident.
Just wanted to throw some new info out there.
I've been catching up on the posts from this past weekend, and see that trolls are back.
Well, ladies, I think I found a case where you will be more than happy to blame the rape victim. You see, this rape victim was passed-out drunk, and ended up with some fairly serious injuries from being anally raped while passed out.
So, you must be wondering why I would possibly imagine that you would be perfectly willing to blame this victim...
it's because this is a case of a man being raped with a foreign object by a woman and scalded with boiling water.
So ladies, even better than laughing at innocent men suffering from false rape accusations, you can raise your glasses and offer up a round of "You Go Grrl!" toasts for Laura M. Smith and her strike at the patriarchy.
[Note - this was meant only for those women (and we all know there are a number of them who read this blog) who truly hate men. If this doesn't apply to you personally, then you can simply disregard my comments, as they were certainly not intended to apply to all women. And, before you get all up in arms about my snarkiness, just check out the even snarkier disclaimers by gender-feminists who begrudgingly acknowledge that there might possibly some men who aren't rapists.]
I've been catching up on the posts from this past weekend, and see that trolls are back.
Well, ladies, I think I found a case where you will be more than happy to blame the rape victim. You see, this rape victim was passed-out drunk, and ended up with some fairly serious injuries from being anally raped while passed out.
So, you must be wondering why I would possibly imagine that you would be perfectly willing to blame this victim...
it's because this is a case of a man being raped with a foreign object by a woman and scalded with boiling water.
So ladies, even better than laughing at innocent men suffering from false rape accusations, you can raise your glasses and offer up a round of "You Go Grrl!" toasts for Laura M. Smith and her strike at the patriarchy.
[Note - this was meant only for those women (and we all know there are a number of them who read this blog) who truly hate men. If this doesn't apply to you personally, then you can simply disregard my comments, as they were certainly not intended to apply to all women. And, before you get all up in arms about my snarkiness, just check out the even snarkier disclaimers by gender-feminists who begrudgingly acknowledge that there might possibly some men who aren't rapists.]
slwerner,
All joking aside, there are feminists who will look at that story and laugh. That is how sick in the head they are.
This is why we use the term 'feminazis', ladies - because you are on the same moral plane as the Nazis. And history will judge you for it.
Slwerner
That story is like the other woman who drugged and then anally raped a guy.
She got no time in jail and did NOT even have to register as a sex offender.
I bet this lady gets the same.
I was wondering what would happen if they had to release everyone in the state that was in prison for a rape offense because obviously rape is no big deal!
Since when a woman rapes someone and keep in mind much more brutally than 98% of all male to female rapes and drugs him also it's not even worthy of one day in jail.
I wonder what the outrage would be after that!
Falsifying a rape is not a right. It is wrong.
Stop False Rape.
This site gives me hope...it's disgusting how the the falsely accused (A stalker of 1 year falsely accused me after i called her crazy/ and told her to stop harassing me) gets away scot-free to try to ruin someone else's life.
The other day the cop told me her records are confidential, but mine aren't so that "I" (ME THE VICTIM) should be careful in the future. WTF
From Archivist's post:
"Too bad our opponents are content to spread half-truths and outright lies, and to paint us as something we are not, rather than deal with us honestly. Rather than debate facts. Rather than JOIN WITH US so we can all eradicate both rape AND false rape claims. I've made that offer repeatedly but no one has ever responded to me."
My reply:
This is the fourth time I am sending you an invite to meet up with just two or three members of our group, as you can bring two or three of your members too, and hold an open and honest discussion in an open, public setting. Your decline to meet, and two of my previous invitations, can be found here:
http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/04/my-harshest-condemnation-yet-for.html?showComment=1271127699861#c6310303308863310790
Since you have opened back up the option to discussion, I would like to accept the invitation. We would like to meet to discuss the significance of rape and false rape accusations. And note that I have never made any statements or opinions on the issue yet, so please do not refer to gender ideology as a reason to decline. I have not stated my ideologies, philosophies, or beliefs on practical, social, or political applications for these issues.
Please reply to accept or decline our response to your invitation so we know whether we may or may not have the opportunity to discuss the issues at hand.
Thank you.
i hate it when police refuse to charge a women for falsely claiming rape just in case real rape victoms will think they will not be beleaved
Post a Comment