. . . at Glenn Sacks' site: http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4631
This is part one of two parts, about the lessons Titanic teaches us about gender. Excerpt: "While the overwhelming consensus at the time was to salute the brave men who gave their lives, the sentiments of one group, the suffragettes, were decidedly less laudatory. The suffragettes seemed to understand that special, undeserved privilege for women did not comport with the gender equality they championed. So how did they respond to the chivalry on Titanic? They denied it, of course. They refused to acknowledge that the treatment women received was either special or undeserved."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
9 comments:
Let us not forget, the suffragette movement in the UK did a deal with the prime minister, they walked around and handed men who had not signed up for the war white feathers, in exchange for this they got the vote.
Google "Order of the White Feather"
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWfeather.htm
check out the poster in particular
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel#p/u/32/regzSbjYw-Q
This makes me wonder if FRS will eventually be censored.
well if google ain't good then yahoo is.But i don't know why i made the jump to google since i always liked yahoo more.Must have been how everyone was saying that they use google
"The suffragettes, it seems, wanted their equality but weren't prepared to give up their belief that women were entitled to special treatment, for reasons they couldn't rationally explain."
To gender feminists, Equal= special treatment. These folks are not very good at math.
You see, "gender feminist hysteria", (if constant and loud enough on all media sources) serves many purposes in modern America. It keeps us all distracted while we are robbed blind.
History will note that American politics were dominated by "Gender feminists", not unlike the decadence that claimed the Roman empire.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255594/Mother-faked-elaborate-rape-scenes-attention-jailed-years.html
Anon @8.59: I'm afraid that whenever men extend more than very minimal equality to the female that there is always a problem in their society. You mentioned the Roman Empire which really began with a decadent female, Cleopatra.As you know, she lived in Rome for awhile and was knocked up by the 50ish Julius Caesar who had a wife when she was a girl. He was later assasinated when he tried to form his own empire with Egypt as the centre. Marc Antony years later also knocked her up and tried the same thing with creating his own empire but was stopped and killed by Augustus who then became the first Emperor. Before this time there was a Republic that lasted 500 years, and before that a Kingdom, and before that a collection of villages. They lived a very clean, lawful and Spartan life and females were even prohibited from drinking wine (at least in public). They knew just as we know today that when females drink they cause trouble. male false rape complaints and become violent. They were familiar with the cult of Bacchus which was like a religion that was mostly female, and had seen Greek plays like the Baccae in which (if I remember correctly) the females worship the wine god and get drunk and engage in orgies, slaughtering the horses in the town and eventually killing the king.
After the beginning of the empire the Romans started to become more liberal and there was a greater female influence and equality. They could drink, get divorces and there were probably even a few female gladiators for the new games that females loved to see(females will always want an excess of entertainment like today if given a chance) Then there was a demand for more and more material goods by females which men of course had to provide.
Whenever there is a big female influence in society there are always big problems.
Gender / Raunch culture is fueled be female pigs, that are turning our boys into pigs.
Post a Comment