It never ends. Here's yet another college newspaper that falls for the myth that false rape claims are virutally non-existent. It says this: "Though some may believe that women only file rape charges out of regret, guilt, or spite, the FBI reports that false reporting of rape accounts is only about 3%."
My comment:
This is incorrect and requires correction. I founded the world's leading site dedicated to giving voice to, and raising awareness about, the falsely accused, The False Rape Society, and it is an urban myth that only two or three percent of rape claims are false. False rape claims are a significant problem.
By way of clarification, the last time the FBI reported on unfounded rape claims was 1996 (it never reported on "false" claims per se), and it found that 15% of all claims were "unfounded." See Dr. Bruce Gross, False Rape Allegations: An Assault on Justice, Annals of the American Psychotherapy Associaton, Dec. 22, 2008. This percentage, by the way, reflected only the claims that the FBI knew were unfounded; the FBI did not suggest that the other 85 percent were actual rapes. Rape claims do not lend themselves to that kind of certainty. Only fiften percent of all such claims result in conviction, so for the vast majority of claims, no one can assert with certainty how many are false.
Every impartial, objective study shows false rape claims are a significant problem. As reported by "False Rape Allegations" by Eugene Kanin, Archives of Sexual Behavior Feb 1994 v23 n1 p81(12), Professor Kanin’s landmark study of a mid-size Midwestern city over the course of nine years found that 41 percent of all rape claims were false. Kanin also studied the police records of two unnamed large state universities and found that in three years, 50 percent of the 64 rapes reported to campus police were determined to be false.” See also, E. Greer, The Truth Behind Legal Dominance Feminism's 'Two Percent False Rape Claim' Figure, 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 947, a scholarly law review article that traced the two percent false rape canard to its unreliable source.
In addition, a landmark Air Force study in 1985 studied 556 rape allegations. It found that 27% of the accusers recanted, and an independent evaluation revealed a false accusation rate of 60%. McDowell, Charles P., Ph.D. “False Allegations.” Forensic Science Digest, (publication of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations), Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 1985), p. 64.
See also, "Until Proven Innocent," the widely praised (praised even by the New York Times, which the book skewers -- as well as almost every other major U.S. news source) and painstaking study of the Duke Lacrosse non-rape case. Authors Stuart Taylor and Professor K.C. Johnson explain that the exact number of false claims is elusive but "[t]he standard assertion by feminists that only 2 percent" or sexual assault claims "are false, which traces to Susan Brownmiller's 1975 book 'Against Our Will,' is without empirical foundation and belied by a wealth of empirical data. These data suggest that at least 9 percent and probably closer to half" of all sexual assault claims "are false . . . ." (Page 374.)
In short, every objective study ever conducted on the prevalence of false rape claims reveals that they are a significant problem. By any measure, denigrating the experience of the wrongly accused by dismissing their victimization as a myth or as unworthy of our discussion, much less our protection, is not merely dishonest but morally grotesque.
Pierce Harlan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Just a general comment. I wish to hell that some of the people who frequent this site and who find fault with everything other men's rights advocates do (they even find fault with readers like Snark and Scott) would do practical things like you do. You spread the word to mainstream publications in a persuasive manner. This is what needs to be done.
It must be ever so fun to sit back and snipe at other men's rights advocates for not hating women enough, or some such nonsense. If all those armchair know-it-alls would put their brains back in their heads spend their time doing things like this, we might actually make some progress.
Gender feminist "mandated misinformation" that only 2% of Rape accusations are false...Is faulty and inflammatory misinformation that has turned our otherwise sound legal system into a sort of "Klan court".
Un-challenged Rape hysteria is very dangerous.
scott.
Constant "women as victim" agitation propaganda has given the gender / Raunch community on college campuses a disproportionate amount of sway over campus politics.
A valuable resource to combat the two percent canard.
Not fair beating up on that Sophomore, Pierce. She's out of her league. Just like it wasn't fair for you to beat up on that troll yesterday.
Anon at 9:46: Oh, come on! I was exceedingly polite (for me) to both the sophomore and the troll. While I understand that neither liked what I said, I promise you, neither one has seen either my vituperative or litigious side. Yet.
Of course I'm kidding you. I wouldn't want to go up against you in court, or on this issue.
I wonder how many young men are going to go to prison as a result of circumstances where neither witness can remember a thing?
How many before a couple of women are charged and some bright spark recognises the lunacy of it?
Because that's what it will probably take.
Excellent point, Gwallan. "I can't remember what happened, but I think we had intercourse, so he must be a felon." It's just as likely -- or more -- that she's the felon. You know, since men are afraid of being too "rape-y" and all.
The Salem Witch Trials ended only after they figured out that no one was safe from false accusations. Today, we're already there -- no one is safe, but not everyone has gotten the news. It will take a critical mass of people being falsely accused and proper media coverage given to it before things change.
Only fiften percent of all such claims result in conviction, so for the vast majority of claims, no one can assert with certainty how many are false.
I can assert that at minimum 85% are false rape claims because when you consider all of the allegations made and after the cops and prosecutors screen out the ones that are too frivolous to prosecute and then the ones lost at trial, only 1 in 7 results in a conviction. Even that is likely much too high when you consider that much exculpatory evidence that a jury never hears is not admitted due to rape shield laws. A jury won't hear whether the female has made false allegations in the past or if she is a habitual drunk who picks up a new man every night.Then you have the number of men who are freed as the result of DNA or other reasons(like the girl admits she lied)Only a very small group of men has even had the benefit of having their cases reopened as the result of DNA evidence and it's very tedious and expensive with only one group, Innocnce Project, involved, as far as I know.
My estimate of the real rapes based on all of the allegations made to the police is somewhere in the 2-3% range.
"My estimate of the real rapes based on all of the allegations made to the police is somewhere in the 2-3% range."
Even the most staunch supporters of the falsely accused put the number higher than that.
P.S.
"A jury won't hear whether the female has made false allegations in the past. . . . "
Depends on the state. The trend is to allow this evidence, under certain circumstances.
"Only a very small group of men has even had the benefit of having their cases reopened as the result of DNA evidence and it's very tedious and expensive with only one group, Innocnce Project, involved, as far as I know."
What you mostly see from the Innocence Project are cases where DNA evidence was not admissible in the initial trial, as opposed to recent cases where DNA is routinely admitted in cases where the issue is whether penetration, etc. occurred.
Again, I don't mean to disparage your thinking, but the fact is, for many if not most rape claims, we just have no idea whether it was an actual rape. The very nature of the crime precludes certainty.
Whoever wrote that "news article" NEEDS to wake the hell up and do some REAL research!
So does the national organization of womyn.
Study: Men Are No Good
http://carbolicsmoke.com/2010/03/02/study-men-are-no-good/
Has anyone read this tripe?
NOW Foundation Urges Closer Examination of Violence Against Women
http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/violence/0210Rapporteur.html
http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/violence/NOW%20Fdn%20Overview%20SpecialRapporteur.pdf
They are still pimping women to believe they are victims of " epidemic violence". Read the part concerning rapes (sic).
Post a Comment