Saturday, February 13, 2010

Woman stabs boyfriend twice, has him jailed on false rape claim, and walks free

This story tells us much about how false rape accusers are treated.  They are not treated as criminals, and that's the principal problem.  A woman who has had twenty (20) previous convictions twice stabbed her boyfriend while he sat on the chair, causing him to bleed profusely, then she had him arrested and jailed on a false rape charge. Only after she recanted was the man given medical attention. This man had helped her get off drugs and appears to be the best thing that ever happened to her.  The court heard all about her troubled background, and the news media devoured every morsel of every detail about it.  The defense attorney mentions the fact that all parties were drinking heavily (that doesn't seem to work when the male is the offender, does it?).  Her sentence?  No jail time.  Read it again: no jail time.  And again: no jail time.  I have no problem with sentencing judges taking into account the background of the offender. I do have a problem that they only do this for women.  But this sort of sentence is precisely why false rape claims are not deterred. Tell me, judge, what sort of message have you just sent to other would-be false accusers?

Nelson mum stabs boyfriend and makes false rape claim

AN ex-heroin addict who twice knifed her partner got him arrested and locked up as well after she claimed he had raped her.

Mother-of-two Sarah Norquoy stabbed victim Raymond Sutherland in the thigh and below the knee as he sat in a chair, after she had armed herself with a knife from the kitchen of their home, Burnley Crown Court heard.

The hearing was told how the defendant had had a troubled background but had at last found a stable home with the victim, who had helped her kick drugs.

Norquoy (29), of Smith Street, Nelson, admitted wounding. She walked free from court after Judge Jonathan Gibson gave her 12 months in jail, suspended for two years, with two years supervision. She must pay £100 compensation.

Miss Sarah Statham (prosecuting) said Mr Sutherland was shocked, jumped up and pushed the defendant away after she attacked him. He was bleeding profusely, went away and eventually went into the living room again after Norquoy had calmed down.

Officers and paramedics were called but the victim refused to go to hospital. The defendant accepted she had stabbed her boyfriend but said it was because he had raped her. Both were arrested.

Miss Statham said she then admitted she had not been raped and Mr Sutherland was released from custody. He went for medical treatment the next day and was found to have two wounds on his right leg. He had stitches and a tetanus jab.

The defendant was questioned by officers and she owned up to the stabbing, but said she could not recall which knife she had used. Police found a selection of kitchen knives in the house.

Miss Statham said Norquoy claimed the victim had earlier put his hands around her neck. She said she had not knifed him then as she was biding her time and waiting for it to calm down. She then decided to stab him twice in the leg. The defendant had 20 previous convictions but none for violence.

Mr Tim Storrie (for Norquoy) said all parties had been drinking in volume with the sole ambition of becoming almost senseless.

Norquoy's upbringing had been without advantage and she had been repeatedly removed from her parents who "just drank." She was, to a great degree, damaged.

Mr Storrie said:"For her, at 28, for the first time ever, in the terrible and disrupted circumstances we hear about today, the only place she could ever really feel is home is that she shared with Raymond Sutherland."

Norquoy had been introduced to heroin by her ex-husband, who was sent back to prison again. Her children had been looked after by other family members. More recently, she had become methadone free and the great strength in that battle came from Mr Sutherland. She placed great value on the victim and the home she shared with him.

Mr Storrie continued: "They may have been drinkers but there were parameters for their behaviour and that's why, despite these recent events, she looks, for a woman with that kind of history, well today. Frightened, but well."

Link: http://www.pendletoday.co.uk/nelsonnews/Nelson-mum-stabs-boyfriend-and.6068637.jp

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

If this was the United States she could have shot and killed him while he was sleeping and walked free.

It's pretty sad but I am actually SHOCKED when ANY woman no matter how criminal he act serves a day in jail.

When I hear of a guy being stabbed or shot or killed by a woman I just automatically assume she will never serve a day in jail.

My big question is if she will even get charged with crime and how much she will make from her book deal and Oprah and Diane Sawyer interviews.

Anonymous said...

Gender feminist perverts who now dominate American pork-ocracies are the deviants who enable womens violence.
Violent women are the ones who kill their children, and say a guy in a van ran off with them. only years later do they find a garbage bag out back of her house with the child in it, and her prints on the duct tape.
It is a serious perversion of our legal community that enables womens violence. Enabling womens violence is also good for the law enforcement community's efforts to rake in more, and more federal pork dollars.
One sick, twisted, violent women will influence sometimes dozens of the men in her life to a life of crime / drugs / violence.
So now that our law enforcement communities are cashing in on their violence statistics, they can't "cut their gravy trains" be stopping womens violence.
Again it may take a civil rights action that BREAKS THE LAW ENFORCEMENT / GENDER FEMINIST pork dollar ALLIANCE.

Anonymous said...

85% of violent crime comes from the matriarchal underclass.
By breaking the patriarchy, we are manifesting obese children on Ritalin, who can barelly read or write.
By breaking the patriarchy we are creatieing a hopeless, un-educated, perpetual underclass of people who have no respect for themselves or of the country that is manufacturing them.

Snark said...

This is how women say 'thankyou', guys ... they stab you in the leg and accuse you of rape.

Just Me said...

You're digging up the dregs of society. The people involved here sound like trash. What's your point?

Anonymous said...

The point is, dregs of society or not:

In America, We need equal justice under law as guaranteed by the Constitution. In the UK and elsewhere in the Anglosphere we need similar protections.

We need to address the needs of both women and men who are victims of psychopaths or are legitimate rape victims.

We cannot live freely in a society that sacrifices the rights of one group to protect another. Hence it will take civil rights actions, as another anonymous poster has mentioned, to save our system of justice from further decay and prevent innocent lives from being ruined or ended.

Anonymous said...

Heres another women who never got help for her unrestrained violence. I wander who the deviants were who refused to charge her for killing her brother. Maybe if she were charged, the murders on this college campus would have never happenned,

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/13/alabama.university.shooting/index.html?hpt=T1

slwerner said...

Anonymous - "I wander who the deviants were who refused to charge her for killing her brother. Maybe if she were charged, the murders on this college campus would have never happenned"

I've been shaking my head ever since I learned that Amy Bishop shot three times at her brother, and still managed to walk away scott-free when his resulting death was ruled and accident.

Anonymous said...

Yep guys the lady mass murderer that shot her brother and walked away scott free......just standard procedure in the United States.

I'm just surprised that she didn't get a book deal and a reality show out of it.

The only reason her latest killing spree even made the news is because a woman was shot.

If she killed 3 guys she could just say it was domestic violence and she was troubled. She would have a better shot at hitting the powerball than seeing more than a few months in jail.

Also think of all the guys on sex offender registries for life for...in fact almost 700,000. And this lady kills her brother and guess what....no registry for her.

So pee in pubic be on a registry.

Kill your brother and remain anonymous .

Nice justice system we have here in the U.S.

Axel said...

The societal refusal to punish women the same as men might just be responsible for the death of three innocent people. If the good professor had been treated the same as a man many years ago when she killed her brother, accident or no, she would have served some time behind bars. And, then, perhaps she would have learned something about the sanctity of human life, about the seriousness of murder. That's why we have prisons - to punish, to deter, to teach criminals a lesson so that, hopefully, they, and others, will be less likely to do it again.

If you want to know who's responsible for the death of those innocent people, every chivalrous man and woman in America should look in the mirror. It might just be you.

AfOR said...

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2010/02/13/middlesbrough-mum-jailed-for-false-rape-claim-84229-25828156/

Anonymous said...

I am the only one who is getting tired of the same boilerplate conspiracy-theory comments over and over again? Repeating the same nonsense ad nauseam doesn't make it true.

There is no "ALLIANCE". Almost every FRA listed on this site was determined through police investigation. Law enforcement doesn't make the law.

There is no "breaking the patriarchy", unequally or otherwise, since you cannot break something that does not exist. The "patriarchy" is an imaginary bugbear made up by women's studies professors.

Anonymous said...

There is no "ALLIANCE". Almost every FRA listed on this site was determined through police investigation. Law enforcement doesn't make the law.

BULLSHIT!

Law Enforcement is in on it. They are also attempting to take away the rights of all people but starting with men because they are the easy target.

You talk about investigations? If they think they can get a conviction either by twisting 'evidence' or lieing to the media, they will. They are scum. I am sure there are some good ones, I do know some, but the majority in this area are only trying to get more money for the area by 'proving' how much violent crime is inthe area.

If you saw our paper and saw how much violent crime is reported in this tiny area of the country, you would never even drive through. Most of the hooplah is just bullshit.

CBGirl

Anonymous said...

There is in fact an un-constitutional "missinformation Alliance" between many law enforcement agencies, and the gender feminist pork buerocracies.The perversion of our legal system started when law enforcement could start "cashing in" male arrest statistics, and could not "cash in" on female arrest statistics. This dynamic invariaby leads to bias and prejudice against men and boys, and ENABLES violent women like the one that shot 3 people on this college campus, when she should have been behind bars 20 years ago for killing her brother.
You get hysterical and say its some kind of ??conspiracy??, when what I'm suggesting is its a kind of perversion of justice.

Anonymous said...

I wander if the perverts who handled this womens case 20 years ago, who made the decision to "not charge her" when she shot her brother, can be sued by the victims fammilies who were killed in her rampage.
There was clearlly a neglect of duty to the community by not charging her.

Anonymous said...

"Law Enforcement is in on it."

In on what?

"You talk about investigations? If they think they can get a conviction either by twisting 'evidence' or lieing to the media, they will. They are scum."

Except we've repeatedly seen the exact opposite on this very website. Are there a few bad cops out there? Sure. Are there examples of police corruption? Yes. But just like there are men who rape, it doesn't mean that men are scum or there is a "conspiracy of silence".

"There is in fact an un-constitutional "missinformation Alliance" between many law enforcement agencies, and the gender feminist pork buerocracies."

It's a fact because you keep saying so?

"You get hysterical and say its some kind of ??conspiracy??, when what I'm suggesting is its a kind of perversion of justice."

I'm not the one being hysterical by claiming there is this widespread collusion without any evidence. Yes, there is a perversion of justice, and it is written into the law itself.

God Of Bacon said...

Athletes get a free ride in the judicial system too.

http://rockyhoffschneider.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

"There is no "ALLIANCE"....

Oh I see, there is no such thing as feminism. Brilliant!

"There is no "breaking the patriarchy"....

Oh I get it, gender amendments and career victimhood don't exist.

"The "patriarchy" is an imaginary bugbear made up by women's studies professors"....

Oh, and I guess the legal system doesn't believe it either!

Anonymous said...

A part of this "Missinformation Alliance" is when men get arrested for domestic violence, when it is in fact the women who was the aggressor.
When this happens, alot of men will plead guilty to a lessor charge, just to get out of jail, and when they do, the GIRLS DOING THE NUMBERS AT THE POLICE STATION, can take this guilty plead, (of which the man was not guilty) and cash in this arrest statistic for federal VAWA dollars.
So in effect, the law enforcement are in fact colluding with other gender feminist pork agencies to get all the federal VAWA dollars they can. But this phenomena is un-constitutional, and it does not matter how many blind men cannot fathom whats going on.
Only when society gets sick enough will it start to address this fundemental perversion of our legal system.

Just Me said...

What are gender amendments?

What is career-victimhood?

Snark said...

Just Me,

I think that's rather obvious, isn't it?

Anonymous said...

"Oh I see, there is no such thing as feminism."

No, you don't, as no one said anything like that.

Anonymous said...

"No, you don't, as no one said anything like that."

Go away.

Anonymous said...

Just Me said...

"The people involved here sound like trash. What's your point?"
"What are gender amendments?"
"What is career-victimhood?"

Looks like Just Me has an IQ of 3.

Just Me said...

To insult someone is nothing more than a cop-out to avoid answering questions.

Again-------

What are gender amendments and why do you disagree with them?

What is the meaning of career-victimhood, and do you apply the term to both genders?

Anon@3:30---- "Only when society gets sick enough will it start to address this fundemental perversion of our legal system."

What is the fundamental perversion?

Anonymous said...

Just Me IQ of 3 said...

"To insult someone is nothing more than a cop-out to avoid answering questions."

To ask for answers without any research on your own is a cop-out to finding out the answers for yourself.

"What are gender amendments and why do you disagree with them?"

Look it up. I'll let this be your homework assignment.

Anonymous said...

Murder, Gender and Punishment

http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_14389770?source=rss#IDComment56760201