Notice 5 things in the following article:
1. This is the third false rape claim this academic year at the university -- correct me if I'm wrong, but that means since last September. Four months. How many actual rapes have occurred in that time? My guess is that it's fewer than three, and likely none.
2. The fact that the article does not identify the gender of the person reporting the false assault, but the gender of the "attackers" is spelled out.
3. The lack of identification of the person making the claim.
3. The fact that the person who admitted to lying about the attack, is sill referred to as the "alleged victim." Since they admitted they lied about being assaulted, shouldn't they be now listed at the "alleged perpetrator"?
5. It's nice to know that all who have filed false reports have at least been charged. We'll try to see if there was any actual punishment in any of those cases.
Sexual Assuault was a false claim
The sexual assault reported to the University of Cincinnati Police Division Friday, Jan. 8, was a false claim.
The alleged victim told investigators the report was not true. The original report said the student was approachecd by two men in front of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning. She said the men felt her up and said "What you got in there?"
The student who made the false report has been "cited for reporting a sexual offense that did not happen," according to an e-mail that Gene Ferrara, director of public safety, sent to the university Monday, Jan. 25.
This false report was the third of the academic year. In each incident, the person making the false report was charged.
Link: http://www.newsrecord.org/sections/news/reported-sexual-assault-false-1.2148554
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
21 comments:
I love how they added that each time this occurred the false accuser was charged. As if it was some after thought that they almost forgot.
I have question. The legal definition of 'sexual assault' as I have read on the official CDC website is anything a woman wants it to be - in other words just even a look or if they simply don't like a man - so doesn't the very definition of 'sexual assault' create a vehicle to legally make false accusations?
And doesn't 'sexual assault' make the whole 'rape' issue null and void legally? It's all very confusing, and no one I have talked to including attorneys can really figure out the whole mess and how the laws apply to men.
I mean in other words- we're spending all this time concentrating on 'rape' when the whole 'sexual assault' hoax cancels all of that out and opens an entirely different can of worms. 'Sexual Assault' laws basically make false accusations legal - because the very legal definition itself is FALSE and most of it has nothing to even do with a sex crime. Do you follow me here? The people who created the 'sexual assault' laws should be prosecuted and the laws immediately abolished.
"Rape hysteria", and all the missinformation that is attached to is, gives the gender / Raunch community on college campusses a significantly disproportionate amount of power over campus politics.
Not just anyone gets the attention and ear of the college buerocratic elite, but if you say you "Represent" "gender feminist" organisations...The college beurocratic elite will hear you.
Hey wait a minute here, most of the folks i talk too say that women NEVER, EVER, EVER,EVER,EVER, EVER, EVER, would lie about rape??
If law enforcement are "manufacturing the 2% false rape accussation number" when in reality the percentages of false rape accussations are closer to 50%, doesn't this missinformation prejudice against the innocent.
This "manufacturing" of faulty and inflamatory missinformation amounts to using state and federal dollars to "prejudice" the average jury of ones peers, and is in fact "un-constitutional"
George Clooney, the CDC website contains a "fact sheet" on sexual violence that lists "Risk factors for perpetration [of sexual violence](harm to someone else)." The FIRST risk factor mentioned is this -- and this is an exact quote: "Being male."
http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/SV_factsheet-a.pdf
While I think I grasp the larger point being made by "George Clooney" -- that the definitions used by many are so expanded that they almost make the words meaningless -- the word "rape" is not used in the statutes for most, if not all, states.
"If law enforcement are "manufacturing the 2% false rape accussation number""
Afaik, the UCR no longer counts how many reports of rape are "unfounded".
Also, the link to the story isn't working.
Georgie Clooney, thanks for the eye-opener. I agreeeee!
Archivist, the Risk Factors (partial list):
1. Being male
2. Having friends that are sexually aggressive
3. Witnessing or experiencing violence as a child
4. Alcohol or drug use
5. Being exposed to social norms, or shared beliefs, that support sexual violence
I can see why you object to #1 (being male). But if they listed the Rick Factors for "victims", it would read "Being Women". See?
#5 is the predominant factor in all acquaintance rape.
GG, the old mouthpiece for the Klan, i thought you were banned from here??
Yeah
How many times does gg have to be banned from here?
Why do you want to ban me when I'm being nice?
Georgia Girl, I'd better respond fast before they notice you've commented. "Being male" is objectionable because "being female" would NEVER be permitted to being the top of any negative list. "Risk factors for irrational behavior" or "Risk factors for deficient driving" or "Risk factors for mood swings" or "Risk factors for abusing children."
And thank the lord for the male sex drive. If it were left to women, the human race would have disappeared before the Flintstones.
Georgia Girl is a False Rape Accuser.
Axel, I tend to agree with that. To say "being male" is risk factor of a perpetrator is such a moot point. I looked at that again in the entire context ... it's irritating ... even to me.
Yeah gg will be nice for the next post and a half.
Then it will be back to the incessant trolling that she has done for years.
What GG said is utterly false, by the way. There is only one risk factor for becoming a rapist: being a habitual felon.
It is a complete myth that rapists are a special subset of criminals. In truth, men who have been convicted of rape and released are not much more likely to commit a rape than the average criminal. Rape is not a "special" crime.
This is why it makes no sense whatsoever to accept an accusation against a man with a clean record at face value.
Feminists believe rape is theirs, they own it, they define it, they make the call, it's their baby, they own the patent.
So when there are websites like this one that claim that some rape claims are false, they cry fowl as though it's some kind of copyright infringement, some kind of patent violation, hands off, that's ours!
I've never disputed that some rape claims are false.
The link to the story still isn't working.
"I've never disputed that some rape claims are false."
An admission of guilt.
Post a Comment