Thursday, January 21, 2010

We can't empower our daughters by pretending they are powerless

Women are special.

There. I've said it. It's something we've always known, but a lot of us have been fearful of admitting it aloud or even to ourselves.

Women are special, and, of course, special people are subject to special rules that don't apply to regular, testicle-bearing people.

You know exactly what I'm referring to. There are a thousand examples of it, too many to chronicle. When a young couple dates, he's expected to pay even if they make the same amount of money; when women decide to start a business, they are awarded financial benefits not available to men simply because they are women; colleges cling to their Women's Centers and insist there's no need for Men's Centers even though women far outnumber men on campus; colleges take athletic scholarships from men and give them to women far less interested in playing sports; when women work with men, the men are told they can no longer talk like men, they must talk like women so as not to "offend" the opposite sex; when teens the same age have consensual sex and her parents find out, she's the victim and he goes to prison for statutory rape; when young adults get drunk and have sex, she's the victim and he goes to prison for rape; when men and women commit the identical crime, she gets a much lighter sentence; when a couple divorces, she generally gets primary custody if she wants it; when there's a war, she gets to stay home and he becomes cannon fodder. On and on it goes.

You see, we, as a society, have hit upon the ingenious notion that we can manufacture equality between the sexes by heaping special advantages on women, and by insuring that they are not accountable for their actions.

In short, we empower women by pretending they are powerless. Since they are powerless, they need all these special advantages.

Now, let's talk reality. The fact is, we can't manufacture equality. The more we "empower" women by heaping artificial advantages on them and by excusing them from accountability for their actions, the more we reinforce the notion that true equality is a lie, that it doesn't really exist. When you let your kid beat you at Whiffle Ball, you're still the better player.

The only way to empower women is to treat them exactly like men -- as responsible adults endowed with the full capacity to live with the consequences of the decisions they make.

But that's not what happens. Western Civilization has come to resemble my local golf course where the women's tee box is on average 50 yards closer to the hole than the men's.

The women's tee is such an apt metaphor for what I'm talking about, I decided to find a picture of a woman golfing to use with this post. Wouldn't you know it -- I stumbled across a report of a study that led me to conclude that the women's tee isn't just a metaphor, it actually highlights the very truths I'm trying to get across. It turns out the greater the distance between the men's and women's tee boxes, the fewer women there will be in management and marketing, and the less money women will make in the locale of the golf course. http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?ID=251& In short, the bigger the "victim" sign a woman wears around her neck, the more special advantages heaped upon her just because she's a woman -- the less chance she will be accepted as an equal.
 
If women want true equality and not just the pretense of it, they need to line up with the guys at the men's tee, join in the raunchy language, and take their best swings. You know what? They probably won't hit it as far as the guys, but they'd be one of the boys. And they might just end up running the company.

That's if they want real equality and not just the pretense of it. Lots of women want the former; most women's groups are content with the latter.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

very well stated. Should be posted on refrigerators

Anonymous said...

"If women want true equality and not just the pretense of it, they need to line up with the guys at the men's tee, join in the raunchy language,"
anon says..i see more "Raunchy" talk coming out of the mouths of raunch/lesbians..then i have ever heard come out of a guy!!

Archivist said...

Agree, Anon.

Anonymous said...

Excellent post Archivist. You must be familiar with Marc Rudov.

http://thenononsenseman.com/

Snark said...

"Western Civilization has come to resemble my local golf course where the women's tee box is on average 50 years closer to the hole than the men's."

Fifty YEARS closer! My goodness! We have no hope of ever beating them at golf when they have a fifty years headstart! ;)

Great piece, by the way!

Archivist said...

Snark, thanks for reading this closely. Sometimes, no matter how many times you proofread, you still miss something.

Anonymous said...

For the record, Annika Sorenstam, Paula Creamer and Michelle Wie all tried to cut into the men's game.
All were humiliated.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 10:24: women should not be allowed on the men's tour if for every woman allowed a man is cut -- unless the men are on the women's tour.

AixelA said...

It's not necessarily women's fault entirely; some men I met will never let me pay for a date, even if I made more. Even if they were unemployed and in debt. That's a major pet peeve of mine.

And it's a bit worse in other countries; in China, the guy(s) ALWAYS pay for EVERY girl. If you planned a first-date with a girl, and she brings 7 of her closest friends, you have to pay for them, no matter what.

And what about "maternity leave?" Would you, as a man, accept a couple months off work, knowing that the entire 2 months would be spent taking care of a crapping, spitting-up, crying, whining, fragile creature? It'd be great if a guy would be willing to do that, but most men I know are scared about it!

Pierce Harlan said...

AixelA, you are right. I place a large portion of the blame here on men.

The Archivist said...

AixelA,

Curiosity makes me ask, who asked who (whom?) out on the date? If he asked, then he pays. If you asked, then you should pay. I personally, don't know any guy who disagrees with this.

Never been to China, so I can't say. I'd be curious to know how you learned that. I've been to several asian countries (Japan, Korea, Phillipines), and never run into that.

For the childcare issue, I'm going to disagree on this, to a point. I would say then, that most of the 'men' that you know, really aren't men. I would love to stay home and take care of our child. But my wife's company doesn't give any compensation for maternity leave, so if we want to keep the roof over our head, I keep going to work every morning. Are there men who are scared of this? Yes. But there are women, that I know, who are just as scared.

The Archivist said...

Sorry,

That last post should read:

My company doesn't compensate for maternity leave, my wife's does. So, if we want to keep a roof over our head...

Pierce Harlan said...

. . . and there's that maternal gatekeeping issue Glenn writes about.

But men really are stuck in their little gender box, aren't we? The guy usually drives -- not me. I'm one of these people who shouldn't drive (too aggressive). I notice the little things, e.g., men standing back to let women out of the elevator first -- why? It's mildly insulting to both genders, and weirdo throwback to chivalry. I don't do it, and I don't care what people think of me (you'd have to know me to understand). Whoever is closest to the door, get out first.

Anonymous said...

Archivist, I think there are at a few reasons why some men are afraid to stay at home and watch even their own child;

1. Some men have no idea what all is involved in taking care of an infant/child.

2. The possibility and/or threat of being falsely accused of molesting/abusing their child.

The Archivist said...

1. Some men have no idea what all is involved in taking care of an infant/child.

Agreed. Just as there are some women who have no idea either.

2. The possibility and/or threat of being falsely accused of molesting/abusing their child.

Since statistically, women abuse children more than men, that says something about just how men are villainized, doesn't it?