The story starts with a line attempted to garner sympathy -- stating she is a mother.
In addition, isn't it funny how police always make a point of stating there will be consequences when a cop is falsely accused? Shouldn't that be the case for EVERY FRA? I guess you and I don't merit the same consideration as law enforcement.
Nicole Soto charged for FRA
SAN ANTONIO -- A San Antonio mom was arrested after claiming two San Antonio police officers sexually assaulted her.
The police department took 26-year-old Nicole Soto's allegations against the officers seriously and launched an investigation. However, after five months of questioning witnesses and conducting DNA tests, investigators determined Soto made up the story.
Police were called out to the parking lot of the West Durango Plaza Apartments back in April after witnesses reported finding Soto's 16-month-old baby inside a car alone. Soto claimed she was raped by the two officers when they put her in custody for allegedly abandoning her child.
According to an affidavit, Soto claimed "a white officer and a Mexican officer arrested her..." and that "the Mexican officer forced her to the ground..." where she said she was sexually assaulted.
"When a report is made, we expect the person who is making the report to tell us what happened and not fabricating it for whatever reason," said San Antonio Police Chief Bill McManus.
Now that the investigation has determined Soto's claims were false, she will face charges.
"When someone does make false allegations against police officers, there's a consequence to it," added Chief McManus.
Soto was charged with falsifying a police report and released on bond. While out on bond for those charges, she was arrested again this week for possession of marijuana.
News 4 WOAI checked with Child Protective Services and was told Soto's baby is staying with relatives.
Link:
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Mom-arrested-for-bogus-rape-allegations-against/96VkkzBMVUSoT58tHCBlgg.cspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
"When someone does make false allegations against police officers, there's a consequence to it," added Chief McManus.
scott says, someone should write chief mcmanus and ask him if the constitution, and his duties as outlined as an officer of the pilicing charters that were granted to him..tells him that officers get better protection from the law than average citizens??
But have faith guys..the police jurisdictions that are in Alliance with the gender feminists, cannot stop the flood of false rape accussations in which their policies over the last 15 years has fomented.
The largest and most profound civil rights case of the last 20-30 years is the case that will "BREAK THE MISSINFORMATION ALLIANCE" between law enforcement community and the new gender feminist communities.
There is no "MISSINFORMATION ALLIANCE". Most police do their job honestly, and the few exceptions do not constitute a conspiracy.
I'd go so far as to say that without the good work of so many police officers, the false rape epidemic would be far worse.
ANON says
There is no "MISSINFORMATION ALLIANCE".
I say..there are some police jurisdictions that are better than others about keeping law and order, and protecting the innocent.
I believe there is in fact a "missinformation Alliance" that has developped between the gender feminists and law enforcement community. You can argue with me until yer blue in the face, and it will not change my position.
History will note that this "missinformation Alliance" of using state and federal dollars to manufacture faulty and inflamatory statistics was in fact un-constitutional!!
"You can argue with me until yer blue in the face, and it will not change my position."
That says it all, doesn't it? Except there isn't any evidence to support the existence of this alleged conspiracy, and repeatedly posting about it can only alienate those who otherwise might support this blog's efforts.
Anon, I'm not trying to alienate anyone from anywhere...I'm just telling the truth, and letting the truth land on the ears that need to hear it.
You say there is no proof, I say there is no "proof" because gender feminists tell the law enforcement that if the truth came out, it would deter real rape victims from coming forward, (in which i say show me the studies that show this to be true). So the Law enforcement community now tell the public false rape accussations are 2% AT MOST, (which is simply not true).
This 2% is a manufactured statistic by the law enforcements use of semantics to redefine what the meaning of is, is, in order to mislead the public that false rape accussations are 2%, when they are not 2%.
This 2% number is faulty and inflamatory missinformation that prejudices against the innocent. The gender feminist reasoning for getting the police to "manufacture the 2% number" is irrational, and irresponsible, and only serves to foster and enable false rape accussers.
Men and boys are getting beat to death in their sleep with bats, and stabbed in parking lots because of false rape accussations, and the current law enforcements practices of "enabling them".
This is a filthy mess of lies that has been built to get us to where we are today..and if there were a civil rights lawsuit to clear up the lies and chaos...only them will light and truth shine in the dark corners of this perversion.
Anonymous said...
"You can argue with me until yer blue in the face, and it will not change my position."
That says it all, doesn't it? Except there isn't any evidence to support the existence of this alleged conspiracy, and repeatedly posting about it can only alienate those who otherwise might support this blog's efforts.
Jan 30, 2010 11:18:00 AM
There is no evidence to prove it doesn't exist.
Unfortunately, with the arrival of the internet, if misinformation occurs anywhere, it occurs everywhere -- and it can do untold damage to all of us even if it is extemely rare, and no matter how well-meaning the groups and individuals may be who become involved in the process. A fascist or two in the last century told "big lies" that were repeated and fomented hysteria, hatred, and resulted in the mass murders of innocent people.
Today, instead of racial and ethnic cleansing of the past, perhaps this generation will have to also confront "gender cleansing" at the hands of gender-feminists as its main social issue.
Why and how do these things get started? At the emotional center and the likely cause of all this conflict, regardless of whether one is a falsely accused person, a gender-masculist, gender-feminist, equity-feminist, or an advocate for equal justice is the concept of humiliation and the feeling of being humiliated. It was in part the humiliation of Germany after WWI that brought about WWII. It was a handful of women who felt humiliated by their circumstances that brought about social changes early in the last century in the United States that helped push for equality: the right to vote, equal work for equal pay, etc. It is the current humiliation of mostly young men and boys at the hands of an unjust and unfair legal system that has brought about the need for this site.
Dr. Evelin Lindner describes how humiliation can be responded to in this article:
http://www.humiliationstudies.org/documents/evelin/SpatialMetaphor.pdf
"Humiliation may be responded to within four categories of reactions: i) Humiliation may be
accepted, ii) it may be responded to with depression, iii) it may be countered with aggression,
or iv) it may be reacted to with the elimination of the humiliators, either by annihilating their
significance, or their physical existence, or by an unexpected method, namely by gaining their
respect.
The last method is the only one that yields lasting peace. Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi stand for this alternative. For thirty years most people expected a bloodbath in South Africa. Why did it not happen? Mainly because Nelson Mandela taught his followers how to overcome the pain and anger caused by humiliation under the system of apartheid.
In South Africa the humiliators and the humiliated sat down together and planned for a society in which ‘both black and white’ could be ‘assured of their inalienable right to human dignity.’
Instead of killing and annihilating his humiliators, Mandela succeeded in convincing them that they ought to discontinue their humiliation. He impressed the white elite. He stepped out of the ‘humiliator’/’humiliated’ dyad, he stepped out of the role of the re-actor, and became an
actor. He rejected the definition of the situation given by the humiliator, and with it the
‘normal’ response to humiliation, namely the upholding of an unbridgeable gap towards the
humiliator. Mandela, as well as Gandhi, ‘undermined’ the gruesome paradigm of humiliation,
and invented a peaceful response to humiliation, namely the denial to accept the role of the
victim."
The conflicts caused by misinformation can end when everyone acknowledges rational, authoritative sources of information; when everyone has respect for critical thinking and fair and just treatment; and when there is truth and accuracy in reporting.
Until then, we need to address the needs of BOTH legitimate rape complaintants AND the falsely accused to restore dignity to individuals and groups on all sides of the false rape conflict.
There is no way to win the respect of feminists or their enablers. They have no respect for themselves or for anybody else. They are only interested in perpetuating the psychotic fantasy worlds of narcissism and self-pity that they have constructed for themselves.
We cannot sit down with them. But we can defeat them politically. We have one big advantage: the truth.
"There is no evidence to prove it doesn't exist."
Sure there is. Induction is disproved by counter-example. Take a look at this very blog. We know about most of the false accusations posted here because the police discovered them.
Post a Comment