So, she cried rape in June. While the story doesn't mention it, I hope that no one was in custody all this time. And I have to wonder, why is it that those that make the false accusations are still allowed to continue in school, when we see those who are on the receiving end of an FRA, are usually kicked out?
Shadia Moore due in court over false report.
Police say, after an extensive investigation, there was no rape in the Austin Building of East Carolina University on June 24.
A woman police say filed a false report of rape at East Carolina University is due in Pitt County Court Tuesday.
21-year-old Shadia Moore is due in court to face the charge of filing a false police report. Police said after an extensive investigation, including SBI lab analysis, it was found there was no assault in the Austin Building at ECU on June 24.
The university says Moore is still a student, classified as a freshman.
Link:
http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/78214917.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
14 comments:
It is a perversion of our culture and legal system to enable false rape accussations.
If Shadia Moore had done this in the UK, and if the Police and Crown Prosecution Service had chosen to charge her with Perverting the Course of Justice, and if she was found guilty.
Or.
If Shadia Moore had done this in the UK, and if the Police had *formally* cautioned her (e.g. done in writing by Insector rank or above)
She would not be on campus.
College has a "Duty of care" to staff and students, and knowingly permitting a false rape accuser on campus is a clear breach of that duty of care.
Fact is, in the UK, even without a conviction or caution, any student or staff member could sue the college for failing in its duty of care.
------------------
False rape accusations are, by definition, both defamatory / libellous and damaging.
Assholes will sue at the drop of a hat if their coffee is too hot.
Nobody as far as I can see is suing their FRA's in civil court.
Why not?
It is open and shut, even of they can't pay, you can bankrupt them, and either way the judgement is something you can then print on 10,000 flyers which is what, 150 bucks, etc etc etc.
An FRA is nothing less than a declaration of nuclear war.
Mercy will be seen as what it is, weakness.
Finish the job your mortal enemy started, give them what they so clearly desire above all else.
Total personal ruin.
AfOR
Woman accused of setting fire to husband's penis
"I'm a jealous wife, his penis should belong to me. I just wanted to burn his penis so it belongs to me and no one else"
http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,1,26440234-948,00.html
Scarred For Life, I can see the feminist response to that already ...
"You go girl!"
-------------------
Re: Tiger Woods which was discussed on this blog a while ago.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6943453.ece
"“I feel really sorry for Elin, since me and my wife were at fault for hooking her up with him . . . I would probably need to apologise to her, and hope she uses a driver next time, instead of the 3-iron,” he said."
Wow. So domestic violence against men is not only acceptable, deserved and funny, it's not enough.
Somehow though, I don't think domestic violence against men will ever be enough until every man is lying still in a bloody pool, a woman proudly waving her fist over him.
Everyone needs to get onto Times Online and comment that it's not acceptable to put this in print. It wouldn't be printed if the roles were reversed; why is the encouragement of domestic violence against men any more acceptable? Post something along those lines. There's no point addressing your complaints to the man who said it - he's not reachable. Address complaints to the Times itself, for printing an encouragement of domestic violence.
Societies and legal systems still treat "women as children", by not holding them accountable for their actions.
Men and boys learn that they will be held accounteable for their actions, and learn to be responsible. How can we as a society expect women are Equal, when the legal system tells them they are not.
AfOR - If Shadia Moore had done this in the UK, and if the Police and Crown Prosecution Service had chosen to charge her with Perverting the Course of Justice, and if she was found guilty."
Here's another one which demonstrates what you are saying. She got a suspended sentence, but a conviction for Perverting the Course of Justice, which WILL stay on her record:
Cheating wife cried rape in text message to husband after fit of guilt over affair
A wife texted her husband to tell him she had been raped at home by a stranger because she felt guilty about cheating with her secret lover, a court heard today.
Police immediately launched an investigation and Helen Dalby, 35, went to extraordinary lengths to stand by her false rape claim.
She underwent a full medical examination and helped police create an e-fit of the imaginary attacker...(too long to post full article)
interestingly, here are the 5 top rated comments...
(BTW, the Daily Mail sucks in many ways, but it is one of the only online papers to allow comments on sex related cases)
=============================
She should receive the same sentence a convicted rapist would receive.
- William J., Plymouth Devon UK, 4/12/2009 16:01
Click to rate Rating 249
Report abuse
=============================
I agree with you Chris. She should recieve a jail sentence of at least 6 months minimum for wasting police time, and be made to pay compensation to the poor men she falsely accused.
I don't care how anxious or depressed she was/is. It's no excuse for falsely accusing an innocent man of such a henious crime.
I think she should also be made to pay back the money it cost to investigate this "crime". Stupid woman.
- Jane, UK, 4/12/2009 15:53
Click to rate Rating 193
Report abuse
==========================
She lied , cost us taxpayers money , got her lover in trouble with the police and her husband is going to stand by her more fool him .............
No justice in this country !
- Anon, Bucks , England, 4/12/2009 15:59
Click to rate Rating 182
Report abuse
============================
£3,800 of public money, our money, not government, not court, but our money!
So why not force her to pay back that money?
We seem to be allowing this sort of thing to happen on a regular basis, yet the person is given a slap on the wrist and told to go away.
If it cost £3,800 to bring her to justice then that is what it should cost her, no ifs, buts or maybes. She took our money and I for one want it repaid.
- A Little Balance, England, 4/12/2009 15:53
Click to rate Rating 165
Report abuse
==================================
Another disgusting example of the sexist bias against men in the legal system.
The judge should be sacked.
- Chris, Wokingham, 4/12/2009 15:44
Click to rate Rating 155
Report abuse
================================
The only reason her husband is standing by her, is because should he divorce her, it being all her fault, he will still lose his home and half of his income.
- Addy Schicklegruber, Madrid, 4/12/2009 16:00
Click to rate Rating 140
=======================
AfOR
slwerner and AFOR,
That story is set to run here in a few days. There are just so many of them, that we can't run them all each day they come out.
Thanks for the prior look for the rest of the readers. :)
Off topic;
"Both were convicted on all charges except theft and together must pay 5 million euros ($7.4 million) to the victim's family. In addition, Knox must pay 40,000 euros ($60,000) to a man whom she falsely accused of the killing".
" Knox must pay 40,000 euros ($60,000) to a man whom she falsely accused of the killing".
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/04/italy.knox.trial/index.html
Here's the thing about Knox, all the women politicians in WA state believe Knox is innocent. Why? Why is it? Is it because she's a young woman? Is that why? Would these same politicians go to bat for Knox if she was a man in the exact same circumstances? I doubt it. I seriously doubt it. It makes me sick.
Anon 11:49,
Washington State is one of the most misandrous in the union. Female friendly divorce courts (more so than most), Sentencing disparities.
It's why I left there.
Archivist, Tennessee is just as bad. I am really looking forward to getting out of here when my time in the military is up.
Anonymous said...
Here's the thing about Knox, all the women politicians in WA state believe Knox is innocent. Why? Why is it? Is it because she's a young woman? Is that why? Would these same politicians go to bat for Knox if she was a man in the exact same circumstances? I doubt it. I seriously doubt it. It makes me sick.
Dec 6, 2009 11:49:00 AM
They wouldn't go to bat for her if she were a male falsely accused of rape or any other violent crime, even if "he" were found to be innocent. They wouldn't go to bat to demand that "he" be fairly compensated and a very public apology be made via the msm.
I was brutally assaulted at university in 1978 and they did nothing whatsoever. I still have neck problems from the strangulation and shaking. False rape accusations really anger me (for clarification I was not raped, the fellow, who I did not know, just beat the stuffing out of me for no reason). Why could I get no help?
Post a Comment