According to The Center for Public Policy, and as reported here and in many other places, at the University of California at Davis, the school’s director of Campus Violence Prevention Program, Jennifer Beeman, fabricated a total of 108 sex offense reports over three years.
As everyone knows, the lies seemed to be primarily related to funding. According to the article: "Would high rape statistics really help a sexual assault prevention program win a grant? Possibly. UC Davis was a repeat recipient of a Justice Department grant through the Office On Violence Against Women, intended in part to increase reporting of sexual assault. There was an expectation, said S. Daniel Carter, public policy director at the watchdog group Security On Campus, Inc., that the school would have a greater reporting rate than other similarly sized schools." Moreover, sexual assault statistics are recorded as part of grant progress reports.
But here is the most chilling aspect of the article: "Over the course of our investigation, we spoke with several dozen victim advocates at campuses across the country. Many said they aimed to facilitate reporting of sexual assault in order to make students feel that they had options in pursuing justice, and to reduce the incidence of rape on campus. Some also said that higher rates of reporting helped them make the point that sexual assault deserved attention and funding." (Emphasis added.)
“Administrators want to know where the problems are,” said Elie Axelroth, head of counseling at California Polytechnic State University, which reported zero forcible sex offenses in 2008. “If we can’t show that sexual assault is a problem, then we’re not going to get the resources. That’s just the practicality of it.”
Ms. Axelroth's cold, calculating rationalization is disturbing on a multitude of levels. And the implications are simultaneously chilling and depressing. Parents who pay exorbitant tuition bills for their sons to attend college likely have no idea that the schools have an institutional interest in falsely accusing their boys of rape -- in order to "make a point" and to get more funding.
Were any innocent young men hurt by the runaway rape inflation at UC Davis? We don't know the particulars, but it is obvious that a witch hunt atmosphere pervaded the campus. It is likely that any allegation of rape was automatically chalked up as a sexual assault regardless of the facts.
As with every other distortion of the truth in this area, such wrongs are minimized or justified as necessary to accomplish the greater good of fighting the war on rape. The article states: ". . . victim advocates see the incident [at UC Davis] as an unfortunate distraction from the well-documented problem of silence surrounding sexual assault."
Statistics on underreporting are, if anything, unreliable, primarilty due to the fact that this area has become unnecessarily gender politicized. While clearly some women do not report, it has never been demonstrated by objective and reliable data that their numbers are significant.
What is beyond doubt is this: rape feminists insist that unreliable stats on underreporting be accepted as gospel while reliable stats on false rape claims be rejected out of hand.
How's this for a novel approach, college administrators? The truth. No more lying about rape, no more making sacrificial lambs of your paying customers just because they born with penises and just so you can obtain more funding and appease the rape feminists.
And some people wonder why young men are staying away from college in droves?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
13 comments:
If they have to create a problem in order to fund a solution, it makes you wonder what their objective is.
Institutionalised misandry is the inevitable outcome of the feminisation of universities.
I agree, Snark. They've created a problem in order to fund a solution. Their objective seems to be to keep the cottage rape industry humming.
“If we can’t show that sexual assault is a problem, then we’re not going to get the resources. That’s just the practicality of it.”
Follow the fucking money.
If you can't show there is a problem, you don't DESERVE the fucking money, go and get a PROPER job you filthy lying whore.
AfOR
I think what we've seen is a runaway epidemic mentality. Yes,the crime of rape presented unique challenges -- some women are raped and are ashamed to discuss it. I'd note that more men are raped who are ashamed to discuss it, but that's an entirely different issue. So some attention needed to be paid to that issue. However, there was no necessity for an entire rape industry to spring up. Now lies are told simply to perpetuate their existence.
The point that is always overlooked: when we insist a rape occurred that didn't, we are blackening the reputation of a male or, if he's not specifically identified, an entire gender. Fomenting rape hysteria just leads to more rape hysteria; more lies; more gender divisive anger.
If you have to lie to make your point then you haven't actually got a point have you?
Right -- it's a false point.
If you have to lie to make your point then you haven't actually got a point have you?
------------------------
Exactly.
You can see that, and I can see that.
Feminists don't see that. Because they have the assumption, made before any evidence is reviewed, that rapes are happening all over the place, all the time, everywhere.
They believe this without any credible evidence that it is happening.
And so fabricating rape statistics to make it seem that there is a problem, is considered by them to be addressing the issue of under-reporting.
But you see, if nobody is reporting their rapes, then how do we know they are happening?
Isn't it just as likely - if not moreso, that rapes are not being reported because they are not happening?
Of course it is ... the very claim that a crime is being 'under-reported' is extremely suspect, because if it is not being reported then we have no data to go on in the first place.
Feminists assume that rape must be happening, constantly, everywhere, and where the statistics fall short of this, it is said that the statistics are wrong, rather than the assumption, which is based on no evidence at all.
They decide upon their conclusion in advance, and then work it into the evidence - or simply fabricate evidence, as seen here, which they consider entirely justified. Because for them, assumption is conclusion. Just as it is for every false accusation.
"If they have to create a problem in order to fund a solution, it makes you wonder what their objective is."
Dehumanization of their enemy (the entire male sex) is the goal. No more and no less. Same thing that has always happened in demographic wars (usually racial). Dehumanize your enemy to make the stripping away of his rights, or even his physical annihilation, acceptable to the masses. Don't kid yourself that they are not very aware of what they're doing. They even come out and state it in articles like these - they lied for funding - "what are you gonna do about it?" is the undertone. They will keep doing this because of the financial rewards and the facade of ideological proof that accrue towards the anti-male cause.
The future is bleak for men in the West, and it will only get worse. The central nervous system for this misandric policy of dehumanization comes out of the University system, which won't lose its prestige anytime soon - though, of course, it should, since we've seen much of its foundation (from global warming to misandric rape hysteria) is based on feet of clay. No matter though. The truth alone is not enough to win, and the misandric enablers in government (Joe Biden, Mr. one step away from the Presidency, for example) love to cooperate in our dehumanization. The future is bleak for men and boys.
Enabling false rape accusations is a perversion of our campus culture and legal system.
This gender feminist perversion of our legal system will not stand the test of time, and will eventually be challenged in courts of the law.
The "gender" feminist culture wins the most when they are allowed to manufacture and disseminate faulty and inflammatory misinformation.
Not all males are being attacked equally on campuses..just the males who are not "gender" feminist.
Zeta, not all males are being targeted by the gender feminist agitation propaganda equally...Its just the hetero-sexuals.
Zeta, not all males are being targeted by the gender feminist agitation propaganda equally...Its just the hetero-sexuals.
That just proves that gay men are damn fools for allying themselves with feminists. They think they're safe now, but the feminists will happily throw them to the wolves in the name of sisterhood.
As everyone knows, the lies seemed to be primarily related to funding. According to the article: "Would high rape statistics really help a sexual assault prevention program win a grant? Possibly. UC Davis was a repeat recipient of a Justice Department grant through the Office On Violence Against Women, intended in part to increase reporting of sexual assault. There was an expectation, said S. Daniel Carter, public policy director at the watchdog group Security On Campus, Inc., that the school would have a greater reporting rate than other similarly sized schools." Moreover, sexual assault statistics are recorded as part of grant progress reports.
But here is the most chilling aspect of the article: "Over the course of our investigation, we spoke with several dozen victim advocates at campuses across the country. Many said they aimed to facilitate reporting of sexual assault in order to make students feel that they had options in pursuing justice, and to reduce the incidence of rape on campus. Some also said that higher rates of reporting helped them make the point that sexual assault deserved attention and funding."
They committed fraud. Why are they not being charged?
IMHO, the joke will ultimately be on feminist and women in general after the system has run out of males to feed upon. Whom do the feminists think it will turn to? Of course feminists have already considered this and have plans but, once a monster is built and fed very well, it is too late to stop it.
Post a Comment