Her own words state what are likely the main reasons for most false rape claims:
'I am such a hateful girl, such a selfish girl.'
Note: this is yet another case where the innocent men were save by a camera. ". . . the men maintained that they had consensual sex with the woman and CCTV footage backed up their statements."
Chloe Dolton False cry of rape
A young woman cried rape after 'fulfilling a fantasy' of having sex with two strangers, a court heard yesterday.
Chloe Dolton, 22, was 'bored' with her life and willingly engaged in the threesome after an argument with her boyfriend, it was alleged.
A jury heard she had previously expressed her sexual fantasies in a diary, in which she wrote: 'I am in crisis. I am so bored of my life and need a miracle.
'I try to be nice and decent but I always end up one way or another trying to **** someone, a girl or a boy.'
The entry on a computer diary entitled The Life of Chloe Dolton continued: 'I should be out having fun with every boy I meet, having sex with whoever I like.
'I am such a hateful girl, such a selfish girl.'
The prosecution said she fulfilled her fantasy at the end of an evening spent drinking alcohol, and later accused the two men of rape because she was ashamed of what she had done.
Dolton told police that Robert Joborski and Gregor Bukowski grabbed her as she walked home alone from a late-night party where she had played drinking games.
She said they then raped her in a stone shelter built into the side of a cliff in the North Devon resort of Ilfracombe.
The two men were later arrested but never charged. They said the sex had been consensual and that Dolton had approached them late at night in a 'chatty and friendly' manner.
Mr Bukowski said after they met he had put his arm around her and they started kissing before Dolton asked if he had a condom.
He then had sex with her although the prosecutor said the 'sex came to a premature end' when Dolton received a phone call from her live-in boyfriend.
Afterwards it is said she had sex with Mr Bukowski again and invited Mr Joborski to join them, and performed a sex act on him. She then returned home where she told her boyfriend she had been raped by the two Polish men.
Dolton's boyfriend went to the scene of the alleged crime where he found two condoms which were handed over to police. But officers who investigated the rape allegations in June 2007 noticed there were 'strikingly different' versions from Dolton and the two Poles who were arrested and interviewed separately.
Prosecutor Jo Martin told Exeter Crown Court: 'It is not unusual for rapists to claim that sex was consensual.'
But she said CCTV evidence and other inconsistencies in mobile phone records of calls and texts would show that Dolton had met the two Poles before the 'alleged attack' and that the men had not grabbed and assaulted her.
The jury heard that on her way home to her flat after the sex, Dolton also bumped into a friend but failed to tell him that she had been raped.
The two Poles gave evidence in court and said Dolton, from Braunton, North Devon, laughed with them and appeared happy after their encounter and that was the last they saw of her.
Dolton denies perverting the course of justice by making the false rape claims.
Miss Martin said of the defendant: 'She deliberately lied to her boyfriend, her family and friends and to the police.
'She clearly lied because probably of her shame and regret. She had in fact had consensual sex with two complete strangers.'
The trial continues.
Thanks to slwerner for the tip.
Link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225474/Girl-cried-rape-living-fantasy-having-sex-strangers.html
Another account is found here -- it notes that the woman was she was convicted and given a two year sentence. It notes: "The two Polish pals - one of whom had only been in Britain for 48 hours - spent 24 hours in a cell as part of a police probe costing £86,500." And: "Dolton lied about the encounter to her boyfriend and family because of the "shame and regret" she felt about it, Exeter crown court heard."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
13 comments:
No criminal charges filed after girl recants rape accusation
http://www.vindy.com/news/2009/dec/01/girl-recants-her-accusation-in-rape-case/
Woods receives fine, and case closed
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091201/ap_on_sp_go_ne/glf_tiger_woods
The moral here is simple: if you are a man, make sure you videotape and store every sexual encounter.
When I read about jail sentences I know right away it's NOT in the United States!!
1st anon,
Thanks for the link.
2nd anon,
The police did the right thing here. No complaint filed, no eyewitnesses, and thier stories match. Not much they can do.
Snark,
Sad isn't it, that it has come to that? That video taping your encounter is necessary to cover yourself?
Anon,
Can't disagree with you there. But what is a surprise, is that this is in England, and they are usually LESS likely to punish a false accuser.
The Archivist said...
1st anon,
Thanks for the link.
You are welcome Archivist.
The Archivist said...
Can't disagree with you there. But what is a surprise, is that this is in England, and they are usually LESS likely to punish a false accuser.
---------------------------
It is changing, 29th October 2009 the UK Appeal Court ruled that a custodial sentence is now MANDATORY for false rape claimants.
Now, here in the UK, we only have to address the gap between false rape claimants and the Police / CPS charging them with the offence of Perverting the Course of Justice.
We are getting there.
Snark said...
The moral here is simple: if you are a man, make sure you videotape and store every sexual encounter.
Dec 2, 2009 6:13:00 AM
....................................
Video tape and store each encounter? With or without permission, a la Andrew Luster?
The upside? Maybe she'll become famous, or infamous, and you can sell it on the internet. Think Paris Hilton or J Lo. or the next Miss California.
Downside: Poor Patsy Ramsay, her little girl horrifically murdered, she and her entire family hated and reviled as child molesting murderers... when someone from her past releases a video of her whooping it up in college...just for laughs...
The alternative moral here might be : Don't have a sexual encounter with someone you HAVE to videotape to prove your innocence.
anon,
That will be the problem. How many times will they just not charge someone? This is going to end up being another stat that the false rape apologists will use to say:
"See, there aren't very many of the false accusations happening. This is the proof."
It won't matter that it will just be because they aren't being charged, not that they aren't happening.
SgtMom said:
The alternative moral here might be : Don't have a sexual encounter with someone you HAVE to videotape to prove your innocence.
--------------------
LOL!
Is the burden on men to not have sex with women who might falsely accuse him of rape?
I think not!
Nor do I think that men who slept with false accusers imagined for a moment that she would soon allege rape.
You don't always know until it's too late; and I hardly think it's fair to blame the man for making a poor choice ...
Women can be quite deceptive!
Blogger The Archivist said...
anon,
That will be the problem. How many times will they just not charge someone? This is going to end up being another stat that the false rape apologists will use to say:
--------------------
Well, it only takes a *little* more activism from the falsely accused.
Like filing a writ against the Chief Constable, and the Home Secretary, for failing in their duty of care by deliberately not charging someone who has demonstrably committed a serious crime.
*THAT* makes it suddenly political, within 24 hours of the writ landing the case will be reviewed and the FRA charged with Perverting the Course of Justice.
More than one way to skin a rabbit.
Anon,
That may be the difference between out countries. I'm not aware, here in the U.S., that you can file something along those lines against law enfocement. Pierce may be able to better answer that one.
Human Rights Act, very nice piece of legislation.
I have a right to liberty, if the state refuses to prosecute my FRA, she is free to make further false accusations against me, thus the state is being negligent in protecting my liberty.
NB you can't use this after you were burgled, because prior to the burglary the state had no way of knowing YOU were going to be burgled.
personal attacks such as FRA's are different, once one accusation has been made against you, the state has a legal duty to protect my liberty by clearing my name, by prosecuting the FRA.
HTH etc
Post a Comment