We hope that our readers have not grown numb to what seems to be an endless cavalcade of false rape horror stories. The following chronicles an especially cruel rape lie. Anyone who would minimize the horrors and injustice of a false rape claim need only examine the story of William McCaffrey. Three years ago this month, Mr. McCaffrey was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment for a rape that never happened. It was a lie. At the time of sentencing, three years ago this month, the following appeared in a New York newspaper:
McCaffrey admitted he was in the car, but he contended the victim was never raped and there was no DNA evidence to prove she was.
Officials acknowledged the lack of DNA, but Assistant District Attorney Shanda Strain said there were bite marks and bruises all over the woman's body, and the judge noted the jury believed McCaffrey raped the victim and then facilitated rapes by his two friends.
"You abducted the victim, held her against her will, threatened her with a knife, beat her and raped her," the judge said. "This attack was disgusting, and for this young woman, it was degrading in the most cruel sense."
The judge said he was especially moved by the woman's testimony that as she was raped repeatedly, "she gave up caring about what was being done to her and hoped only that you would not take her life."
(JUDGE WALLOPS BX. RAPIST WITH 20 YRS., New York Daily News, October 21, 2006. Link here: http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2006/10/21/2006-10-21_judge_wallops_bx__rapist_wit.html)
Notice the "he said/she said" nature of the allegation; the absence of significant, much less dispositive, corroborative evidence; and the false accuser's frightening credibility on the witness stand. Those things are a chilling recipe for injustice, and one that ought to concern every innocent man and the women who care about them. The judge, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Richard Carruthers, showed no mercy, and addressed this innocent man as if he had behaved like an animal.
Now, three years later, as we previously reported, the false accuser has found religion, and her priest, Rev. Zeljko Guberovic, one of the only heroes in this story, convinced her to come forward with the truth. She confessed in March of 2009, but Mr. McCaffrey wasn't released until September. That's an extra six months because, obviously, the state believes its lumbering, inefficient process is more important than a man's liberty. But now an innocent man finally has been freed from prison, after almost three years. We don't know what horrors he faced behind bars, but it is fair to assume his life was destroyed beyond repair, due to a selfish rape lie.
The New York Post reports that a grand jury is now considering evidence to convict her. It is doubtful that even if she is charged and convicted that she will serve as much time as her victim, another common trait of false rape cases.
Here is the story from the New York Post:
Rape-lie rap looms
By BRAD HAMILTON
Last Updated: 5:03 AM, October 4, 2009
Posted: 3:45 AM, October 4, 2009
A woman who allegedly lied about being raped in 2005 and sent an innocent man to jail could soon be facing her own trip to prison, The Post has learned.
Prosecutors are now presenting evidence against her to a Manhattan grand jury. A source said perjury charges were "likely."
They plan to call witnesses to testify that Biurny Peguero Gonzalez made up a story of having been raped at knifepoint in upper Manhattan because her pals were furious with her for leaving them.
Among the witnesses is the Rev. Zeljko Guberovic, her priest at St. Anthony's, in Union City, NJ, where Gonzalez, 26, confessed to the fabrication in March, sources said.
Gonzalez had accused William McCaffrey and two of his friends of gang-raping her in Inwood. He was convicted and sentenced to 20 years before being released last month.
Link: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/rape_lie_rap_looms_UH6Q3vI8XtnqV8MRMtZTMP
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Woman who sent man to prison for cruel rape lie 'likely' to face perjury charges
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
24 comments:
Thank you for this site. I get angry every time I visit here and I hope that all readers have the same reaction. You perform an invaluable service bringing these stories to peoples' attention.
Sadly, I think this is one of those cases where punishing the false accuser really will discourage future recantations.
The woman was off scot free, and only her new-found religion, conscience, and priest made any difference. If you think about the fact that many women are able to hide the fact that a child her husband thinks is his was actually fathered by another man, it's pretty easy to see how a lot of women would choose to take the secret to their graves rather than spend time in jail.
As much as women will scream about it, I think the only real answer is to not place so much credibility in every accusation of rape and do some actual real police work when investigating the case.
To borrow from our recent post on this question: We have been confronted with this argument many times at False Rape Society, and we think refusing to punish false accusers for fear of putting off would-be recanters is the wrong approach since it would only serve to perpetuate, indeed encourage, a vicious cycle of more and more false rape claims.
The solution to the false rape problem is not to continue to hand women and girls the power to lie and destroy with impunity the lives of innocent men and boys (and I mean literally without punishment), all in the hope that some of the false accusers could, or might, or possibly will -- decide, at their own whim and discretion, to recant and spare the falsely accused victim further pain. The solution is to deter these lies from ever happening in the first place, as much as possible.
At present, there are innumerable false rape cases where the accuser does NOT recant, despite the absence of serious punishment for lying about rape. So, relying on recantations to spare falsely accused men is a slender reed on which to rest any argument about punishing false accusers.
We advocate a sliding scale for sentencing, allowing lenient punishment for recantations that occur before identifying a specific individual; greater punishment after identifying but before an arrest, etc. Early recantations should be encouraged and rewarded, but even they need to be subjected to more serious punishments than currently exist. This will have the salutary effect of encouraging early recantations.
It is well to note that fears about discouraging would-be recanters with punishment are based on the present state of our law and culture where false accusers know they can lie with impunity and there is no effective deterrence whatsoever. If the law is changed to impose greater sentences for false rape reporting, it will be clear that lying about rape is a serious crime, like rape, and there will be far, far fewer Hofstras.
Every other criminal act is assigned a sentence, in part, to deter others from committing that act based on the seriousness of the act. The more serious the crime, greater the need for deterrence, and the greater the sentence. (There are, of course, other purposes for sentencing as well, but deterrence is an important one.) Underlying the claim that increasing sentencing will hurt innocent men seems to be an unstated belief that deterrence simply does not work. That belief, of course, bucks centuries of collective wisdom.
False rape accusers lie because they can, and because they believe they have some need to do so. If we convince them they can't lie -- at least not without serious consequences -- it is likely we'll see a significant decrease in false rape claims.
False rape accusers lie because they can,
People have been lying since the beginning of time: so long, in fact, that one of the oldest moral codes contains as one of only 10 principles an injunction against "bearing false witness against thy neighbor."
Relying solely on recantations, and the "thin reed" of a woman's guilty conscience, to save men from the consequences of women's lies will provide more incentive to perpetuate the lies. False accusers really do lie because they can, and punishing those who have a conscience does absolutely nothing to affect all the rest who still can.
While the legal system does rely to a large extent on plea bargains and guilty pleas to lesser charges, many convictions are still secured as a result of investigation and evidence. The fundamental incompetence of the legal system in not doing competent investigations is the biggest part of why liars can lie. If their lies were to be discovered as a result of investigation, then, yes, severe penalties would be in order and very useful.
But, as long as all a liar has to do in order to escape punishment is to keep lying, I think you will see men taking it upon themselves to gather the evidence that the incompetent investigators failed to find.
When we start to be able to know for a fact "what really happened", a lot of sacred cows might end up being hamburger.
You're wrong. What you're forgetting is that the compulsive liars who make up this crap also constantly contradict themselves. There is no reason to give a false rape accuser a free ride from prosecution out of fear that they'll never "come forward" because they leave all kinds of evidence. When you are a worthless liar you leave a trail of slime behind you a mile wide -- we just need to get the legal system to care enough to look for it.
What you're advocating -- giving false rape accusers immunity from prosecution in the hope that they'll occasionally "come forward" -- is the most vile appeasement imaginable.
This is really the flipside to the old "don't prosecute false accusers because that discourages real rape victims!" canard. Instead you're saying "don't punish false rape accusers because that will discourage other false rape accusers from coming forward!"
You're wrong. What you're forgetting is that the compulsive liars who make up this crap also constantly contradict themselves. There is no reason to give a false rape accuser a free ride from prosecution out of fear that they'll never "come forward" because they leave all kinds of evidence. When you are a worthless liar you leave a trail of slime behind you a mile wide -- we just need to get the legal system to care enough to look for it.
Amen brother...
So far only my lawyers have seen the contradictory and fallacious trail of slime.... well, the police have seen it and ignored it...
we await the hearing day with anticipation.
AfOR
When you are a worthless liar you leave a trail of slime behind you a mile wide -- we just need to get the legal system to care enough to look for it.
What you're advocating -- giving false rape accusers immunity from prosecution in the hope that they'll occasionally "come forward" -- is the most vile appeasement imaginable.
That is not what I am "advocating" at all. The biggest problem with this whole cultural screaming match is the hair trigger a lot of people have on certain issues and the tendency to open fire on people who are actually on their side.
The point is that we have a criminal justice system which is not built on having a criminal spontaneously confess the crime. People are convicted of crimes every day without relying on them having a spontaneous attack of conscience and walking into a police station and saying "Yup, I did it."
Your first point is the salient one - we need to start bringing political pressure to bear to try to force police to actually investigate a rape report and determine that a) a crime actually did happen, and b) that the accused person is actually the one who committed it.
In order to get this done, we must demolish the old canard that "women don't lie about rape" and develop an awareness that they, in fact, do.
That will be much easier to do once we have some felony convictions we can point to.
"Now, three years later, as we previously reported, the false accuser has found religion, and her priest, Rev. Zeljko Guberovic, one of the only heroes in this story, convinced her to come forward with the truth."
Now, this really peeved me. She obviously didn't find enough religion if it took her priest's very insistent (God bless'em) pestering to get her to confess.
I mean, really, did she think she could just tell her priest, have the weight lifted off her shoulders and then go on her merry way while the guy she falsely accused rotted in jail? That's pretty fucked up.
To the blog author(s?), I gotta hand out thanks. I was aware, peripherally, of false rape allegations, but had no idea there were so many cases that actually went to court and fucked someone's life over.
It's made me much more careful of how I interact with random women now.
I mean, really, did she think she could just tell her priest, have the weight lifted off her shoulders and then go on her merry way while the guy she falsely accused rotted in jail?
Yes.
That's pretty fucked up.
Yes.
I would go beyond saying that it is "pretty fucked up" to it being really fucked up.
You know, the only incident that comes to mind where the "offender" found "god" (AA group) and admitted his guilt was the Liz Securro case. Remember that one? He admitted to rape after many years.
The McCaffrey case is sickening. I think the false accuser should be imprisoned for as many months as the "innocent" man was imprisoned.
What is WRONG with these IDIOTS?! I'm referring to both the RAPISTS and the FALSE ACCUSERS.
Hey wait a minute...I hear all the time WOMEN AND GIRLS....NEVER,EVER,EVER,EVER,EVER,EVER lie about being raped!!EVER!!
Break the gender feminist / law enforcement misinformation Alliance. The misinformation Alliance is a perversion..to forward a perverted agenda.
And the misinformation Alliance is unconstitutional. State and federal dollars cannot be used to manufacture and distribute faulty and inflammatory misinformation.
"People have been lying since the beginning of time..."
Acknowledging a vice doesn't make it a virtue.
How long did the priest know about it? Shouldn't he have come forward? They are supposed to report serious crimes.
Norm, I'm wondering about that myself. If she confessed to a priest in a confessional box, is he obligated to report her "sin"?
I don't think that the priest can violate that confidentiality, according to church rules. He could order her to report it herself as a condition of her penance, however.
Nothing could stop her from just going to another priest and getting ten Our Fathers and ten Hail Marys instead, though.
On another topic, here is the lastest feminist pork coming out of Washington: http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/insurance/2009-10-04-womens-health_N.htm
Basically the feminist want men to have to pay the same for health insurance as women -- even though men don't need maternity coverage! Here comes another freebie at men's expense!
Atom,
like I said, I would think they're supposed to report certain crimes. Since the crime of rape is elevated to such a ridiculously high status, one would certainly think it's one they should report.
btw, you're not trying to redirect the blame onto the priest are you? The liar herself and no-one else is at fault. Just like Duke, where they redirected the spotlight onto Nifong - but if there had been no Crystal Mangum, there would have been no Nifong.
Norm: that's right. The lies started with Mangum; Nifong just enabled them.
Some reporters even called Mangum "the fourth victim," as if she was anything but a lying bitch who deserved to spend the rest of her life in prison.
She is LIKELY to face charges!
Isn't that the same word LIKELY that was used in the Hofstra case!
This disgusting woman does not deserve to serve the "same amount of time" that he did.
If you kidnapped someone for 3 years you would be doing 25 to life and that is exactly what she did and she should serve that much time as well.
Someone needs to hound these DA's and judges after these cases clear. Force them to make statements. Draw them out and make them look like the schmucks they were. THEY facilitate these cases. They are more interested in "scoring wins" than justice and it shows.
Hi,
This is a message for the webmaster/admin here at falserapesociety.blogspot.com.
May I use part of the information from this post above if I give a backlink back to this site?
Thanks,
James
Anon,
Please contact us a falserape@yahoo.com on this please.
Post a Comment