Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Special prosecutor drops rape case against ex-cop

So, she said no initially, which would support the rape charge, but then later asked for oral sex, and later was sitting on his lap. She then also slept in the same bed with her supposed rapist. The text that stated that her rapist was black when in fact Mr. Duncan is white, also seems to make this a case of regret, not rape.

Charges dropped agains officer.

GLENWOOD SPRINGS — A special prosecutor has dropped the rape case against a Parachute police officer who lost his job as a result of the allegations.

Tammy Eret, the chief Mesa County deputy district attorney who was brought in to handle the case, said she questions the credibility of the alleged victim. In a motion to dismiss the case, she outlined 22 concerns about the alleged victim’s credibility, and suggested the woman might have had consensual sex with the man, then regretted it.

Magistrate Lain Leoniak on Wednesday agreed to dismiss the case.

The defendant, Kristopher Duncan, a former Marine and Iraq war veteran, said he hopes to return to law enforcement, but he hadn’t decided where. His lawyer, Greg Greer, of Glenwood Springs, said it remains “unanswered” whether or not his client can sue Parachute for being fired in the wake of the incident.

“I think the biggest thing was the embarrassment that I would even be accused of something like that,” Duncan said, “but I knew I didn’t do anything wrong.”Duncan was arrested after a woman alleged that he raped her when she came with friends to his Battlement Mesa apartment on April 17 and was sleeping in his bed.

The woman said she didn’t fight off Duncan because of his strength and his position as a police officer. She sent a text message to a friend saying she might have been raped, and reported the alleged incident to police. A hospital rape exam showed no sign of trauma.

“I knew it wasn’t true,” said friend Caryn Sigmon, of Rifle, who was at the apartment that night. She said she was “very shocked” when she learned the woman had accused Duncan of rape, and when Garfield County sheriff’s investigators never asked her for her account, she came forward. She accompanied Duncan at the hearing.

After an initial investigation, Eret wrote, further investigations into accounts like Sigmon’s cast doubt on the alleged victim’s story, as friends who were at the apartment that night painted a different picture. They described the woman as flirting with Duncan and said she asked him to perform oral sex on her, then sat on his lap after the alleged incident.“Simply saying ‘no,’ but then requesting oral sex” would suggest she consented, Eret wrote.

In a telephone call police set up between the woman and Duncan, Duncan allegedly acknowledged the woman initially said she didn’t want to have sex, but later seemed to be playing “hard to get.” Investigators said Duncan told her he would have stopped if she had asked, but she didn’t ask.

The woman said she was worried about Duncan’s strength, but Eret noted the two were close to the same size. The alleged victim is five-feet-five-inches tall and weighs 140 pounds. Duncan is another inch taller and about 20 pounds heavier.

Witnesses told investigators that the two were “flirting with each other, laughing, tickling and having a good time.” Instead of leaving, they said, the woman went to sleep in Duncan’s bed and never called for help, even though Duncan’s roommate is also a police officer. Afterwards, they said, she slept in the same bed, wore Duncan’s sweatpants and sat in his lap. That would be unusual for a rape victim, Eret noted.

“The interaction between the two … supports two people comfortable with each other and the acts that just occurred,” Eret wrote.

She added: “It would not matter how exhausted one may be — if they were just raped, the last place they would go would be to the bed where the crime occurred and the place where that person was sleeping.”

The woman also apparently sent a text message to her boyfriend saying she had been raped by “a black guy,” although Duncan is white. That also cast doubts about her credibility, Eret said.

Greer praised Eret’s decision to drop the case. “Our challenge now is just to restore his good reputation,” Greer said.

Link: http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/home/special-prosecutor-d

12 comments:

scott said...

“I knew it wasn’t true,” said friend Caryn Sigmon, of Rifle, who was at the apartment that night. She said she was “very shocked” when she learned the woman had accused Duncan of rape, and when Garfield County sheriff’s investigators never asked her for her account, she came forward. She accompanied Duncan at the hearing.

scott says..of course they didn't ask her, her account. Anything that may prove the girl was lying is simply "irrelevant" to the rape lynching the law enforcement community is now engaging in.

Anonymous said...

Slightly OT.

This whole feminism thing, it's hard to perceive anything accurately, when you are on the inside looking out.

Here is a FACTUAL example.

Star Trek, the television show, not the original with Kirk, but the later spin-offs.

Did you know that SERIOUS books have been written, published, and sold, in large volumes, on the basis that the Ferengi are actually a representation of Jewry, and as such their portrayal (money grabbing, big ears, etc etc) is nothing more or less than anti-semitic.

Star Trek, and Sci-Fi in general, encompasses a far smaller sphere of humanity than feminism, nevertheless, the principles are the same.

In Star Trek fandom, this issue (Ferengi are Jews) is taken seriously and causes a partisan split in the fan base, the proprotion of the fan base that finds a "third way" is precisely zero.

It is the same with feminism, though the sphere it encompasses is far larger.

We have to fight fire with fire.

Arguments stating that the Ferengi are no Jews are utterly pointless, you just ceded the ground to those who claim they are, by agreeing to fight on that particular battlefield.

The only way to SUCESSFULLY beat those who suggest that the Ferengi are Jews is to belittle them, in public, at every possible opportunity.

A/ "The Ferengi are Jews!"

B/ "Have you ever actually had sex, you know, with a woman, as opposed to your right hand?"

Sooner or later A will blow his top and reveal his true nature.

It is the same with feminism, you simply cannot reason with them, in doing so you cede the battlefield and choice of weapons to them, and you lose before you started.

A/ "All men are rapists!"

B/ "How would you know, you're too butt ugly for anyone to fuck, even if you paid them."

AfOR

Archivist said...

AfOR, you draw an interesting analogy.

I would take issue with one thing you suggested. Among commentators on this blog and among MRAs in general, there is this feeling that feminism is bigger than it really is -- that vast numbers of women and even lots of men believe themselves to be feminists. In fact, while most people believe in gender equality, relatively few people are devotees of that religion's strange man-hating beliefs (and please, angry young feminists, don't tell me what feminism is in THEORY -- I know all that).

You mentioned "Star Trek." Go to Google and type in "Star Trek." Make sure you use the quotation marks so you don't accidentally pick up other things. Write down the number of results. Now do a new search for: feminism -- and then do one for: feminist (there will be some overlapping results in the last two). Write down the number of results.

Just for fun, do a Google search for "Star Wars"

Compare the number of results.

I submit to you that, despite the incredible noise and disproportionate clout they carry, a lot more people are interested in "Star Trek" than feminism. And a hell of a lot more are interested in "Star Wars."

Anonymous said...

I submit to you that, despite the incredible noise and disproportionate clout they carry, a lot more people are interested in "Star Trek" than feminism. And a hell of a lot more are interested in "Star Wars."

Oh, I agree wholeheartedly, BUT, with the exception of putting your religion down as "Jedi knight" on a census form, trekkies make precisely zero effort to control legislation and law enforcement.

Perhaps this is best proven by suggesting that you and Pierce attempt to set up and get state funding and recognition for a refuge for abused Klingon females.

AfOR

Johannes said...

It would be more in line with what people are actually interested in and what matters in people's lives to introduce star wars and trekkie studies departments at unis and fund star trek consultants and studies about whether or not spock is a jew or whatever. it would also be far more democratic as it would actually get people's actual support.

gender extremist sit in their ivory tower for the most part. publish study after study. and then have shit like vawa tellered based on their findings.

not that i care for star wars or star trek. but trekkies dont get government funds. why should gender etrimists receive them?

Anonymous said...

Feminists are the proverbial squeaky wheel that gets the oil. We need to squeak louder.

Norm said...

I'm wondering why, if the woman who lived with her came forward, and (I assume) said she was lying, why the cop got fired in the first place? From what I gather from the story, she came forward before he got fired, didn't she?

The Archivist said...

AFOR,

Just so you know, Archivist is Pierce. I'm The Archivist. It's a little confusing, I know.

Anonymous said...

Just so you know, Archivist is Pierce. I'm The Archivist. It's a little confusing, I know.

Oh God, the poor boy's developed a split personality under the strain... lol

AfOR

The Archivist said...

Gotta agree with Veldan in the most recent post. You are damn funny. In case it hasn't been said, thanks for stopping by our site. Considering what you are going through, I'm glad that you haven't lost your sense of humor.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Feminists are the proverbial squeaky wheel that gets the oil. We need to squeak louder.

Oct 14, 2009 11:18:00 AM

Thank you. I have mentioned this before. Brilliant minds think alike.

Anonymous said...

We need to squeak louder, and we need to contribute louder, and we need to write to our representatives louder, and we need to vote louder.

If we do all of those things on a regular basis we will win.

Oh -- one other thing: we need to serve on juries.