Interesting note from reader Axel:
Given the current state of our society where the victimization of women by men is deemed fact, irrefutable and sacrosanct, I had the following thoughts:
(1) Most women use cosmetics to make them appear young and beautiful so they can attract male attention.
(2) Some of those cosmetics are anti-wrinkle gels made from foreskins. You read that right. A portion of a vital organ is forcefully taken from baby boys with neither good reason nor their ability to personally consent, and some of those foreskins end up helping cosmetic companies get rich from the female desire to sexually attract a male.
(3) Most women claim, to varying degrees, that men objectify women.
(4) Surely some of the women who use parts of stolen penises so they can attract male attention claim that men objectify women.
And, that, Pierce, strikes me as a delicious, cruel irony.
To keep this note on point with your blog:
(5) Surely some of the women who use parts of stolen penises so they can attract male attention falsely accuse some of those same males whose attention they've attracted of rape.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
21 comments:
I love it. They use our dicks to attract our attention, then they insist that men objectify women because men think with their dicks.
Last line is a killer.
Material for aborted fetuses is also used in the cosmetic industry.
AfOR
Thanks, Pierce.
AFOR, that's a whole other issue, but you're right.
Obviously, it's a Slow day for false rape claims.
Atom/GG - "Obviously, it's a Slow day for false rape claims."
Ya! Only two? Who'd have guessed?
I suppose you have nothing to say about those two?
At least nothing worthwhile, if the recent past is any indicator, I have to add.
Atom, we have false rape stories lined up until late November. But I like to vary things a little by putting up pieces I am certain will annoy you. I've got one with Al Sharpton popping up shortly.
Kindly go haunt one of the sites that denies the existence of false rape claims. Those angry lesbians are always looking for more good Georgia girls.
Hey Atom, you are a CUNT.
Foreskin tissue is used in other applications particularly as a culture to grow burn dressings.
The use as a cosmetic base has always incensed me however. I've drawn analogies to vampires who consume of others to maintain their youth.
Foreskins in cosmetics? I'm skeptical...
Oh, and in case anybody didn't already know this -- "objectification" is just some bullshit that the feminists borrowed from Karl Marx. Marx used to talk about "the objectification of labor" so the feminists whine about "the objectificataion of women." It's just meaningless rhetoric; another way they try to control what we're allowed to look at.
Put some of that wrinkle remover on your eyelids and you'll be cockeyed.
What cosmetics using foreskin or aborted fetuses are we talking about here?
If I use such cosmetics, I do so unknowingly.
At age 56, I use cosmetics to attract and keep my well paying job - not to attract men.
The vast majority of men I've known detest cosmetics. I have been urged innumerable times by men not to "wear that crap, you look better without it".
...this info needs to be gotten to the public...
Oprah Endorses Using Babies’ Foreskins to Make Cosmetics
The question of whether or not to circumcise their newborn baby boy is often the first of many life-altering decisions parents makes on behalf of their baby. The issue in question is whether or not it’s ethical to use babies’ foreskins in the making of cosmetics.
What happens to a baby boy’s foreskin after it’s removed in the hospital? Naturally, you might think that it is disposed of with other “medical waste,” but as I recently learned, that’s not always the case. There is, in fact, big money to be made in the foreskin business, not just the money gained from the removal, but from what becomes of the foreskin after the fact. Laura Hopper, a midwife who blogs at Alternative Birth Services recently wrote that wrinkle treatments are being made using American babies’ foreskins. Hopper quotes two articles, both detailing the use of baby foreskin in the cosmetic industry. From Acroposthion:
The most disturbing and alarming [controversy] is in the unethical trafficking of neonate foreskins. Not only do parents of North American baby boys have to pay between $200 to $300 to obstetricians to circumcise their boys that no sooner are the circumcised foreskins cut off that they are sold on to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies by the hospitals.
The resale value of neonate foreskins is astronomically dizzying in that from one boy’s foreskin can be grown bio-engineered skin in a lab to the size of a football field. That’s 4 acres of new skin or around 200,000 units of manufactured skin, which is enough skin to cover about 250 people and sells at $3,000 a square foot. Considering that there are 1.25 million neonate foreskins circumcised each year in the U.S alone this translates to one of the most lucrative trades, if not THE most lucrative trade in human body parts ever in the history of humanity.
Hopper ends her post saying, “Wake up people, your children are being exploited for profit.”
I have to believe that many parents wouldn’t stand for such a thing if they knew it was going on. Although I chose to leave my son’s penis intact, I would never think to ask my doctor, “What is going to happen with my son’s foreskin after it’s removed?” But surely parents have to consent to this sort of thing, don’t they? Is it listed in the fine print somewhere on the parental surgical consent form? If it’s not, is this ethical?
Jennifer Lance at Eco Child’s Play seemed shocked herself at the news when she wrote WTF? Baby Boys’ Circumcised Foreskins Used for Wrinkle Treatments and said, “Glad my son’s foreskin is still where it belongs on his penis and not injected into some old woman’s face looking for the fountain of youth.”
According to Summer Minor who blogs at Wired for Noise, the use of baby foreskin to make cosmetics isn’t anything new. Back in 2007, she wrote Human Foreskins are Big Business for Cosmetics.
Foreskin fibroblasts are used to grow and cultivate new cells that are then used for a variety of purposes. From the fibroblasts new skin for burn victims can be grown, skin to cover diabetic ulcers, and controversially it is also used to make cosmetic creams and collagens. One foreskin can be used for decades to grow $100,000 worth of fibroblasts.
Minor reports that back in 2007 concern was growing over the ethics behind using human foreskin for cosmetic purposes. “One such cosmetic company, SkinMedica is raising a stir over their use of the growth hormone left over from growing artificial skin from foreskin fibroblasts.”
SkinMedica, which sells for over $100 for a 63-oz. bottle, was made famous by Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters. Winfrey in fact has promoted SkinMedica several times on her show and website. Discussions about the ethics of using human foreskins for vanity have been circulating on the web but there has not been a response from Winfrey on this debate.
Cont...
‘If the cream was made from the bi-product of baby afro-American clitoral skin, would Oprah still be promoting it?’ There’s no answer to that question on Mothering or Winfrey’s site, and Winfrey declined The Tyee’s request for an interview.” Go figure.
There are uses for removed foreskin that may seem slightly less controversial like using it to create bio-engineered skin for burns, persistent leg ulcers, bed sores, reconstructive surgery and other skin problems. The Foreskin Mafia writes, “Now, circumcision really does have health benefits, only it’s not the baby boys who are losing parts of their penises who benefit.”
In case you are wondering if your cosmetics were made from foreskins, it’s not as easy as looking for the word “foreskin” in the ingredients. After all the foreskin is not actually an ingredient, but is used as a culture to grow other cells which are then used in the cosmetic. The ingredient you are looking for is likely called Tissue Nutrient Solution or TNS™, human collagen or human fibroblast.http://www.richguysclub.com/?p=1338
seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
Morgan, you seem like a bit of a stretch to me.
I wonder how many gender feminists and other man-hating feminists would be horro struck to discover this. How many of them have been applying gellified (maybe I created a new word?)male infant genitalia skin to their skin. I almost want to say some but, it might be obscene.
Pardon me, I'm trying to stifle some laughter.
The secret is that they are only interested in attracting gay men.
All kidding aside, I think the whole thing is disgusting.
Man hating feminists don't use face cream.
They don't even shave their legs, for god's sake!
This stuff has to be extremely expensive. Strictly the $500. for a pair of shoes crowd.
Post a Comment