From my experience following false rape cases closely, certain classes of males seem to be at greater risk of false rape claims than others. These include (and the reasons they are targeted): police officers (to suggest illegitimacy for arrests, and for spite); school teachers (to suggest illegitimacy for reprimands, for spite, and for any number of irrational reasons, given that most are lodged by teen females); cab drivers (they are convenient scapegoats to "explain" being out late or some illicit sexual encounter with another man); boys statutorily raped (their statutory rapists all-too often cry "rape" to "explain" their sexual encounters with their victims); and young men on one-night-stands involving alcohol (because women experience greater after-the-fact regret than men). It is widely accepted that the threat of false accusations keeps some men away from the teaching profession. Is it just a matter of time before males in the other frequently targeted groups avoid those professions/situations? I suspect it is.
Here is yet another false rape claim against a police officer:
Rape claim against Shelby cop was bogus
By LOU WHITMIRE
News Journal
SHELBY -- A woman who claimed she was sexually assaulted by a Shelby police officer has confessed to concocting the rape allegations, authorities reported Thursday morning.
Already charged with felony escape, Samantha Ramirez also faces criminal charges for making false allegations after she jumped from a police cruiser Monday, Richland County Sheriff Steve Sheldon and Shelby police Chief Charles Roub Jr. reported.
Authorities said the 19-year-old Shelby woman bolted from Officer John Guisinger's cruiser Monday as he was driving her to the county jail via MedCentral/Shelby Hospital after an appearance in Shelby Municipal Court. Ramirez apparently had lost consciousness in the courtroom, where she was facing charges of falsification and resisting arrest.
She eluded a search by local, county, state and federal authorities, but turned up Monday night at Ashland Samaritan Hospital. There, Ramirez leveled the rape accusation against Guisinger.
Roub said Thursday an emergency vehicle transported Ramirez, accompanied by a U.S. Marshal, from Ashland to MedCentral/Mansfield Hospital, where she underwent a forensic examination before being transferred to Richland County Jail.
On Wednesday, authorities said, Ramirez told sheriff's Sgt. John Nicholson that she made up the rape story.
The sheriff's office has been investigating Ramirez's allegation of sexual assault, while Shelby police launched an internal probe.
According to the news release, Guisinger failed to handcuff the woman, who had been wrapped in a blanket after complaining of being sick.
"Although the cruiser's door latches are disabled from the rear interior, the window switches are not. A master window lockout switch was not engaged on the driver's door, allowing the rear windows to be operated from the rear," a joint statement said.
"Windows must be able to open for safety and operator/passenger comfort, and are therefore not completely disabled."
Several eyewitnesses reported Ramirez rolled down the window, opened the door using the outside door handle and jumped out as the cruiser slowed for a school zone. After her exit, Ramirez sprinted into a cornfield before Guisinger could stop and get out of the car.
Guisinger, who Roub said did not follow departmental procedure regarding transport of prisoners, faces internal disciplinary action.
Authorities said Guisinger voluntarily underwent a forensic exam in an effort to disprove Ramirez's assault allegation.
Charges are expected to be filed against Ramirez, pending the outcome of discussions between the Richland County prosecutor's office and Shelby's law director. She remains in jail on $500,000 bond.
Charges also are pending against several others suspected of involvement in the case.
According to a news release, after fleeing the squad car, Ramirez got a ride to Shelby from an unidentified woman. From there, investigators determined a family member drove her to Ashland.
Link: http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/article/20091009/NEWS01/910090321/1002/rss01
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
14 comments:
Hey, wait a minute here..I thought women / girls would never, ever, ever, ever lie about rape??
It is a societal perversion to enable women and girls to potentially incite violence with false accusations.
False Rape, false stalking, and false domestic violence accusations are the trigger used by some women to incite violence in many situations.
Enabling these violent women, to initiate "womens violence by proxy", is a perversion that is nearing the end of its time.
Agreed. We enable false accusers by doing virtually nothing to stop them, by minimizing their prevalence and significance, by insisting that the subject always veer back to rape. The way we, as a society, treat false rape claims is misandry in action.
I can only speak for myself of course...
But at least 40 people in my immediate circle have undergone a dramatic change in attitudes since my arrest for alleged rape.
They all, like me, now read about alleged rape and sexual assault cases, and unless the alleged victim is battered and bruised (whoopi's "rape-rape") they frankly don't believe it.
Attitudes to the Police have also changed, negatively, to one of gross incompetence and stupidity.
Speaking personally, Police becoming victims of false accsations are the one sector of society that I have precisely zero sympathy for.
------------------
And now for something politically incorrect.
Last night I was lying awake (as the falsely accused do) and imagining a conversation with one of my false accusers, the younger one.
It occured to me that having played the false rape card, once (God willing) the Court case is over and the dust is settled, it is essentially "Open Season" on her.
Meaning, anyone who feels like it can rape her, and provided they abstain from obvious violence, there won't be a damn thing she can do about it, nobody will believe her.
Then, the next week, the same thing can happen again, shades of the little boy who cried wolf.
----------------------
Basically all my accusations (DV on up) centre around a child custody case, and what we are really talking about here is a systemic abuse of the system, repeated lying on oath on affidavits and Police statements etc.
This is not like an accused lying saying "I didn't do it guv."
This is a quite different type of lie, far worse in my opinion because "I didn't do it" does not embroil an innocent third party.
-----------------
In actual fact, I am coming to the conclusion that this culture of deliberate lying, particularly in the whole women vs men family court system, is not merely systemic abuse and lying.
I am starting to think that it is in fact a cancer eating away at the very heart of the legal system, literally killing it from within.
If we have no Law, we have no Civilisation.
Speaking for myself, I do not fear a return to lawless anarchy, brute force and violence is something that I am better equipped for than my accusers, bring it on.
But what about my octogenarian mother, or my toddler kids, they can't stand and fight and win, so I have to be the defender of them too.
And then "might is right", I will get sole custody of my kids, but how will _I_ know that I actually deserve sole custody, I'm hardly impartial.
These bitches and their cohorts are in my view engaged in actions no less serious than collaborators and quislings in wartime.
The penalty for lying on oath, in an affidavit, or in a statement, should be death.
AfOR
Well AFOR, we can start with this... Recognize the obvious that it is unconstitutional for the law enforcement community in Alliance with the neo gender feminist community:to re-define what the meaning of is, is, in order to manufacture faulty and inflammatory misinformation to disseminate to the public.
This first perversion (law enforcement / gender feminist misinformation Alliance) has many, many farther reaching consequences to our society as a whole.
I believe the perversion runs so deep, it may well take the American religious community to correct it, for it is their children also that are forced into the matriarchy.
Interesting things to ponder.
It seems as though one might take the feminist influence in an hysterical way and even make grandiose leaps of judgment into the realm of conspiracy. Being as I am still young and have only been seeing this sort of thing for the past year or so perhaps that skews my sight but perhaps not.
My worry is that hysteria and fear will be superimposed upon the female gender just as it is by some women upon men. Such as one comment on another story was something like "If she says no even playfully just get up and leave. Don't take the chance."
I can see the rationale behind this but it still seems rather extreme.
What I would hate to see is the propaganda of hard core feminists in essence be reversed and then we would have the opposite problem of males being overly afraid of females. :)
What I would hate to see is the propaganda of hard core feminists in essence be reversed and then we would have the opposite problem of males being overly afraid of females. :)
What do you suggest as an alternative mechanism for pushing women into becoming concerned about these issues?
My experience has been that women in general only start to have any concern about anything when it starts to affect them directly. As long as men are bearing the bulk of the risks and the downsides to give women the relationships they want, and men keep doing that and women don't suffer anything due to the lack of relationships, what counter-force exists to make them reconsider the lies they parrot here, and many other places, day in and day out?
As long as any group of people are totally spared from experiencing any of the consequences of their own actions, it is very unlikely that they will change.
That is true. Hhmmmmmm....
Now it seems we'd be spilling into a debate about social and gender behaviors as society would average them. Very interesting. This needs more discussion.
"Spilling"?
It quite seems that we are already there.
My worry is that hysteria and fear will be superimposed upon the female gender just as it is by some women upon men. Such as one comment on another story was something like "If she says no even playfully just get up and leave. Don't take the chance."
What is hysterical about that? If she even thinks the word "no" you should RUN.
"If she says no even playfully just get up and leave."
"No means no."
"What part of 'no' do you not understand?"
"No means no."
"What part of 'no' do you not understand?"
These days, a YES might mean No.
"If she even thinks the word "no" you should RUN."
Even a YES, run regardless. It's not worth it anymore.
These days, a YES might mean No.
As was just the case with Danmell Ndonye at Hofstra.
Well she could be saying yes, and then tell the police she said no. If you don't believe this happens..u just are not paying attention to some of these stories.
Post a Comment