Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OUR MISSION
Followers
Liberty Bell
AVfM Donations
Reforming the justice system
Defending rights in higher education
False Rape Activist Paul Elam
Links: Information About False Rape Claims
- ● RUSSLYN ALI: 'Dear Colleague letter (lowered standard of proof on campus for sex charges, etc.)
- -- Criticisms of 'Dear Colleague' letter
- ● ROY F. BAUMEISTER: Is There Anything Good About Men?
- ●EMILY BAZELON and RACHEL LARIMORE: How often do women falsely cry rape?
- ● CYNTHIA BELL: Rape should be tough to prove
- ●ROY BLACK: Why we should protect those accused of rape
- ●CAMPUS SAFETY AND SECURITY DATA ANALYSIS CUTTING TOOL
- ● PROF. ALAN DERSHOWITZ
- --The trouble with rape prosecutions
- --When the rape rap is phoney
- ●SUSAN ESTRICH: Discussing the Al Gore rape case
- ●FATHERS AND FAMILIES WEB SITE
- ●ZACHARY FOWLE: Accused often guilty until proven innocent
- ●EDWARD GREER: The truth behind legal dominance feminism's 'two percent false rape claim' figure (debunks two percent canard)
- ●BRUCE GROSS: False Rape Allegations: An Assault On Justice (overview of false rape studies)
- ●AYA GRUBER: Law professor says feminists should abandon tough rape laws and the war on crime
- ●STEPHANIE GUTTMANN: How date rape 'education' fosters confusion, undermines personal responsibility, and trivializes sexual violence
- ●PIERCE HARLAN and E. STEVEN BERKIMER: Don't forget victims of false rape accusations
- ●CHAD HERMANN
- --Men are From Wilkinsburg, Women are From Collier
- --One-in-One-Thousand-Eight-Hundred-Seventy-Seven
- --The lessons of Michael Haywood
- ●AMANDA HESS: False rape claims and rape culture
- ●SANDY HINGSTON: The new rules of college sex
- ●JOANNE JACOBS: Rape and the bathroom wall
- ●KC JOHNSON: Durham-in-Wonderland (the Duke Lacrosse blog)
- ●KRISTIN JONES: A curious anomaly at UC Davis
- ●EUGENE J. KANIN: False rape reports
- ● RICHARD KLEIN: An Analysis of of Thirty-Five Years of Rape Reform: a Frustrating Search For Fundamental Fairness
- ●KENNEDY v. LOUISIANA (outlawed death penalty for child rape due, inter alia, to possibility of false claims)
- ●KOSS REPORT
- ●JIM KOURI: Duke rape case all too common
- ●JESSICA LACK: Playing the victim is overplayed
- ●JOHN LEO: A rape accusation at Brown
- ●PROF. ALAN LEVY: Political correctness is alive and well on college campuses
- ●CARRIE L. LUKAS: One in four? Rape myths do injustice, too
- ●HEATHER MacDONALD: Campus rape myth
- ●MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE: Recommendation for dismissal of Strauss-Kahn case
- ●CHARLES P. McDOWELL: 'False Alligators' and fuzzy data: a new look at crime analysis
- ●WENDY McELROY
- --Continuing to defame the 'Duke 3' as rapists
- --Duke rape case raises issue of protecting identity of accused
- --False rape charges hurt real victims
- --Rape scandal turns sympathy into skepticism
- --Treat accused, accuser alike
- ●MSNBC REPORT: FALSE ALLEGATION THWARTED BY POLICE CAMERA
- ●NATIONAL COALITION FOR MEN
- --False accusations
- ●NCHERM: THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION RISK MANAGEMENT
- ●SARAH OVERSTREET: Coercion doesn't make sex a crime
- ●DR. TARA J. PALMATIER: Shrink4Men
- ●KATHLEEN PARKER: Picking up after the Duke debacle
- ●RADAR: Respecting accuracy in domestic abuse reporting
- ●RAINN: Reducing risk of sexual assault
- ●RAPE INVESTIGATION HANDBOOK: False claim red flags
- ●ANNA RITTGERS: Sometimes Women Lie About Rape
- ●KATIE ROPHIE: Date rape's other victim
- ●THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE: Dedicated to the defense of liberty and human rights
- ●SCIENCE DAILY: Women Have Not Adapted To Casual Sex, Research Shows
- ●SLATE DOUBLEX GABFEST: Jamie Leigh Jones and other high profile rape cases
- ●CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS
- --In making campuses safe for women, a travesty of justice for men
- --Researching the 'rape culture' of America
- ●JONNA M. SPILBOR: What If Kobe Bryant Has Been Falsely Accused? Why the Law of Acquaintance and Date Rape Should Seriously Penalize False Reports
- ●STATE PENALTIES FOR FALSE REPORTING
- ●STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR RAPE
- --National Conference for State Legislatures
- -- Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN)
- ●STERN REVIEW (UK)
- ●SHAUN WEBB: A Motion for Innocence
- ●LAUREN WEEDMAN: I lied about being raped
- ●TOY SOLDIERS WEB SITE
- ●NAOMI WOLF
- --A tale of two rape charges
- --Why is rape different?
- ●CATHY YOUNG
- --Last cry for 'rape crisis' feminism?
- --The noble lie, feminist style
- --Sexual assault on campus--is it exaggerated?
- --The unique power of crying rape
- --Who says women never lie about rape?
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Search This Blog
Become a fan of FRS on Facebook
Buy This Book
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Revolver Maps
Flag Counter
21 comments:
I've seen this a couple times before. A couple observations:
1) The dark-skinned lady in the pink top that they interviewed, 'you go girl', is a sick pig.
2) The cop is obviously a jerk, as are most cops. His attitude is typical, I'm surprised he didn't confront the guy being accosted. What he said when interviewed proves once and for all that cops are NOT 'just following order'/'hands are tied' in domestic abuse cases.
P.S.
the cop isn't necessarily supposed to call 911; even though he's off duty, he's supposed to show his badge and confront the woman.
'You go girl' says it all. That's how they react to false rape accusations, too.
I don't understand why that incompetent cop still has a job. He isn't even ashamed to admit on national television that he's a bigot who allowed a crime in progress to continue?
His excuse: "That's the way I was raised."
Well sir, you might also have been raised to hate black people, but that doesn't mean that you can be a racist on the job; similarly you aren't allowed to act out your anti-male chivalrous prejudices because mommy and daddy taught you to let you sisters pound you until your face look like hamburger. You can let your wife treat you like that, but you still have a responsibility to enforce the law.
I am asking myself what is going on here, and I don't think it's as simple as all women hate men, or all women elevate women over men. That's too simple, and it doesn't hold up in a lot of other aspects of life.
I am wondering how the women and the cop would react if a huge football player was attacking a normal sized guy and the latter was a clear underdog. My guess is it would have spurred the women to call the cops because of the obvious mismatch between the two combatants.
If even two normal sized guys were fighting, my guess if a lot of the women would have called the cops because someone might get hurt and even Officer Chivalry would have broken it up. That was my experience on the playground as a kid.
Are both men and women trained to view women as the automatic underdogs because of men's typical size and strength advantage?
Do most people assume that when a women reacts like this she's acting against type and that, therefore, there "must" have been a good reason for it?
We've all seen the old movies where the wife is chasing the husband with a rolling pin and nobody thinks the husband is in great danger. It was funny. But knowing what we know now about male injuries from dv, maybe it's not so funny.
I mean, looking at the two of them in this video, most people would think he could flatten her if he wanted -- or at least get away from her.
Bottom line: my guess is most people would think he's really not in danger in that situation. My guess is that what we are dealing with is a stereotype -- a stereotype that men have promulgated.
I mean, it now turns out that Saddam Hussein could have spared his country from attack if he hadn't coyly led the entire world to believe he was hiding WMDs. He couldn't flatly admit the truth (that he didn't have them) or he would have been weakened, he felt, in the Middle East.
Likewise, is our male macho front such that we've kind of indicated to the world that women aren't a threat to us?
Finally, doesn't this show that people need to be educated about the dv stats that show incredible numbers of men injured every year at the hands of the women they love? Isn't the lesson here that we need to break a gender stereotype?
I don't mean to suggest that I have all the answers. I know one thing: if the answer is that women are misandrists, I'd prefer that we shipped them all to an island somewhere.
Wow.
First, hats off to ABC and the female psychologist for telling it like it is. And hats off to that collection of women who finally grabbed a pair and called the police. Put all the men who passed by to shame.
The cop is a punk, who allows his own personal biases to apply the law in a manner discriminatory against his brothers. Norm nailed it in that attitudes like the his (the cop's) are the reason why men are jacked up more often in DV calls...because both men and women perceive a guy as a threat.
And the you-go-girl woman needs to get bitch-slapped herself. She's the worst out of all.
WOW excellent piece!! Enabling and fostering womens uncontrolled violence, raises the overall level of societal violence.
@Pierce,
"Are both men and women trained to view women as the automatic underdogs because of men's typical size and strength advantage?
"Do most people assume that when a women reacts like this she's acting against type and that, therefore, there "must" have been a good reason for it?"
It seems self-evident, at least to me, that the anwer to both these questions is "yes." However, the former is mostly innate, whereas the latter is completely due to what some call 'socialization' - at its root, it is due to misandry having been spread so far, especially, in this case, by the media.
Also some guys are going to rag on me for saying this, but I think whoever made the video 'cheated' a little. Other than when the woman grabs the guy by his head, whereas it appears the man is actually about to choke the woman. I think the man/men did go a little further than the woman,if you consider the video in its totality.
Recommendation: instead of venting explosive anger at me, view the video again carefully and you will probably see what I mean. (not that anger isn't justified when it comes to these issues.)
off topic
The truth about male victims of domestic abuse
http://dahmw.org/
Commentary: 'Revolution Anyone?'
http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212255009.shtml
FOX: The Trouble With Textbooks
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/09/03/tucker-carlson-textbooks/
U.S. Life Expectancy at All-Time High but Men Still Lag Behind
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/us-life-expectancy-at-all-time-high/
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060512/news_lz1e12schlafl.html
http://www.theghostnation.com/forums/topic/15233-the-catalog-of-anti-male-shaming-tactics/
"When men are the victims, virtually no one cares"
I've been saying this for years.
Feminism is working well.
Because of safety concerns regarding one's liberty, asexuality is on its way to becoming the sexuality of choice for all heterosexual men.
Asexuality? Not likely.
I share the frustration over feminist indoctrination, but I have to tell it like it is -- the doomsday scenarios that are sometimes brought up on this blog, such as all heterosexual sex being made illegal, aren't going to happen.
Our justice system is terrible, but all men aren't going to suffer a dystopian fate.
"all men aren't going to suffer a dystopian fate."
If radical feminism is allowed to run its course unobstructed, that is exactly what will happen to men. Please see 'Legalizing Misandry', by Nathanson and Young, Ph.D.'s.
Thanks for the follow! I also have my own website. Come visit me at
more template Click quick
With feminists, their enablers, their supporters, the media, the system, and most if not all of society, it is mind over matter. They don't mind the way things are N.O.W. because (to them) men do not matter.
"Asexuality? Not likely."
"I share the frustration over feminist indoctrination, but I have to tell it like it is -- the doomsday scenarios that are sometimes brought up on this blog, such as all heterosexual sex being made illegal, aren't going to happen."
Someone's head is buried in the sand.
Of course heterosexual sex won't outright be "made illegal". But the point is that if things keep going the way they are, that, or something close to it, will be the effective outcome.
Remember, some of the things we see that are in place now, would have been thought ridiculous only ten or even fewer years ago. And I'm sure when guys brought them up back then, they were shouted down by 'doomsday-debunkers' (or whatever.)
Amen, Norm.
If things continue to get worse, society will definitely pay a price, but that is a far cry from claiming that doomsday for men is on the horizon. Things can get a lot worse without most men even noticing.
For the sake of argument, let's say that there are 100,000 rape cases each year in the US (a very rough estimate), and that every single one of them is the result of a false accusation (an obvious exaggeration). That would mean that around 5% of men would be falsely charged with a sex crime at some point in his life -- with 95% never being charged.
Compare that to the number of men who die each year from smoking or heart disease.
This is not to belittle the importance of defending innocent men, of course, but to engage in hyperbole is foolish for a number of reasons. Men are at risk of being second class citizens with lesser rights than women across a range of issues but the vast majority of men will never be falsely charged with a crime.
Post a Comment