Thursday, September 24, 2009

Professor Fired, Escorted from Campus by Police over Mysterious ‘Sexual Harassment’ Charge Two Days after Complaining about Defects in Policy

There are so many things wrong here, that I will only ask that all who read this and are disturbed by the incident, please click the link at the bottom and fill out the complaint email.

Professor fired for complaining sexual harassment policy doesn't cover false accusations.

ATLANTA, September 15, 2009The abuse of campus sexual harassment policies to punish dissenting professors has hit a new low at East Georgia College (EGC) in Swainsboro. Professor Thomas Thibeault made the mistake of pointing outat a sexual harassment training seminarthat the school's sexual harassment policy contained no protection for the falsely accused. Two days later, in a Kafkaesque irony, Thibeault was fired by the college president for sexual harassment without notice, without knowing his accuser or the charges against him, and without a hearing. Thibeault turned to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) for help.

"If you were to write a novel about the abuse of sexual harassment regulations to get rid of a dissenter, you couldn't do better than the real-life story of Thomas Thibeault," FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. "Anyone with a modicum of respect for freedom of speech or simple fairness should be aghast at this blatant abuse of power by East Georgia College."

Thibeault's ordeal started shortly after August 5, 2009 when, during a faculty training session regarding the college's sexual harassment policy, he presented a scenario regarding a different professor and asked, "what provision is there in the Sexual Harassment policy to protect the accused against complaints which are malicious or, in this case, ridiculous?" Vice President for Legal Affairs Mary Smith, who was conducting the session, replied that there was no such provision to protect the accused, so Thibeault responded that "the policy itself is flawed."

Two days later, Thibeault was summoned to EGC President John Bryant Black's office. According to Thibeault's written account of the meeting, which was sent to Black and which Black has not disputed, Thibeault met with Black and Smith. Black told Thibeault that he "was a divisive force in the college at a time when the college needed unity" and that Thibeault must resign by 11:30 a.m. or be fired and have his "long history of sexual harassment ... made public." This unsubstantiated allegation took Thibeault by surprise. Black added that Thibeault would be escorted off campus by Police Chief Drew Durden and that Black had notified the local police that he was prepared to have Thibeault arrested for trespassing if he returned to campus. At no point was Thibeault presented with the charges against him or given any chance to present a defense. Refusing to resign, Thibeault understood that he was fired.

Most likely realizing that he had fired Thibeault without any of the due process mandated by Georgia's Board of Regents, Black then began attempting to justify Thibeault's firing after the fact. On August 11, Black wrote Thibeault to say that since Thibeault had failed to resign by the deadline, "EGC has begun dismissal proceedings. ... [A] faculty committee has been appointed to conduct an informal inquiry." He then paradoxically wrote, "Their charge is to advise me whether or not dismissal proceedings shall be undertaken." Meanwhile, Thibeault still had not been provided with any charges, he was still banned from campus, and he still appeared to be fired-with the "dismissal proceedings" occurring after the fact.

Then, on August 25, Black wrote Thibeault again, claiming for the first time that Thibeault had actually been suspended, not fired: "the committee's finding was that there is sufficient evidence to support your suspension." Black added that Thibeault was about to be terminated for sexual harassment, that the charges finally would be sent upon request, and that Thibeault finally could request a hearing. Thibeault requested the charges on August 28 but has received no response. His lawyer also has inquired for weeks with no response.

"How can a public college professor in the United States be fired and kicked off campus by the president and police but, more than a month later, still have no idea why?" asked Adam Kissel, Director of FIRE's Individual Rights Defense Program. "Do Georgia's taxpayers know this is how their colleges are treating their professors?"

FIRE outlined many of these shocking violations of due process and freedom of speech in a letter to University System of Georgia Chancellor Erroll B. Davis Jr. on August 27, with copies to Black and Smith. None of them has responded. Neither Black nor Smith has even bothered to comment on the discrepancies between Thibeault's account and Black's erratic letters.

"It is hard to imagine a worse failure of due process in this case," Kissel said. "Nobody knows what the actual allegations are because they are being kept secret, even from Thibeault himself. In the stunning absence of any charges, evidence, or hearings, it is clear that EGC has punished Professor Thibeault for speaking out against a flawed harassment policy."

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation's colleges and universities. FIRE's efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America are described at thefire.org.

Tell EGC to restore the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the Georgia Board of Regents. Write a letter to EGC and the Board of Regents here.

11 comments:

jeana said...

You know, although he has a right to know exactly what kind of things he’s being charged with, sometimes there are a long list of complaints about a person and finally they do something relatively minor and boom—they’re out. Maybe he is a troublemaker. Maybe he was a sexual harasser. I guess we have to wait to see what complaints there are about him, since they would have to be documented.

Anonymous said...

Jeana, by your own logic, maybe you really are a sexual abuser, and all you are doing is camoufrage and grooming.

AfOR

Anonymous said...

"that the school's sexual harassment policy contained no protection for the falsely accused."



Sexual harassment means "anything a male does that a female doesn't like".

It was designed to be used as a trump card to advantage women against any man in the vicinity.

That's why they got so heinously pissed when he brought up that there was no provision to protect the falsely accused.


See, we're not supposed to pay attention to the man behind the curtain.


I bet the school also has a policy about how they "don't discriminate based on sex,race,age,religion,etc.".


They've pulled an Orwellian-style mindfuck re-framing terms like "discrimination",too.

Anonymous said...

Love Thyself
Respect Thyself
Protect Thyself

#3 is a 24/7 responsibility for all men. If you don't look out for yourself and perform the necessary safety steps every single day of your life, people like jtroll will come along and try to take your liberty away from you.

jeana said...

AfOR,

I have no clue what you're talking about.

The Archivist said...

jeana,

Maybe he is a troublemaker. Maybe he was a sexual harasser.


In the FIRE letter:

EGC has entirely failed to provide Thibeault with notice of the charges, a hearing, the evidence against him, an opportunity to challenge specific accusers, or a chance to respond to any alleged evidence. Nor did EGC produce any evidence that any individual ever alleged sexual harassment under any definition, nor did EGC produce any formal report of sexual harassment.


Jeana, notice the bolded part. There are no complaints, or evidence of any kind to support your claim that he has sexually harrassed anyone. They fired him because he disagreed with thier policy (correclty), in that it was easily abused, and offered no protections to anyone falsely accused.

Anonymous said...

Jeana @ 1:10

You are a liar, but let's make it crystal clear anyway.

You, in your own words, subscribe to the "no smoke without fire" theory, and naturally you will also be an advocate of "If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear, and nothing to hide."

So, put up or shut up time for you Jeana....

Post your name and place of work and town.

We can then lodge malicious and false complaints about you.

Since those who have nothing to fear, have nothing to hide, you will divulge this information.

Since there is no smoke without fire, you will then be thought of as someone who is almost certainly not totally innocent of some sexual offence or other.

AfOR

jeana said...

AfOR,

#1, Why would I ever be foolish enough to give out any information on myself to males who hate me?

#2, Just because they haven't given him anything yet doesn't mean there isn't anything. Maybe there isn't anything. Or maybe there is and their lawyers told them to hold off.

#3, I did put in my first comment that there would have to be some sort of documented complaints about him in order for these charges to stick, right?

#4, Employers do get rid of people they want to get rid of in ways that they shouldn't. Such as this, maybe. Or through a layoff instead of a firing.

Anonymous said...

#1, Why would I ever be foolish enough to give out any information on myself to males who hate me?
************

Nobody hates you, j-troll. We just find you annoying and pointless. You aren't as important as you think.

Anonymous said...

It's impossible to know exactly what's going on here with so little information, but from a 'how does it look in the media' viewpoint, Thibeault has totally owned every other player. The university administration comes across as hiding under their desks.

Whatever the truth of the matter, Thibeault has handled it beautifully - obviously keeping records of every transaction, refusing to be coerced in directions contrary to his interest and insisting on due process.

In the absence of more detail, I'd go with the competent, credible party who's ready to provide information over the bumbling, inconsistent and seemingly silent party any day.

In case anyone thinks that's naive, consider that anyone who offers information is taking a risk - that information is usually very easy to verify of discredit. The more information offered, the more risk taken. But people who prefer to say nothing - especially lots of people who say nothing - give the impression they're not willing to take any risk at all. The longer they stay quiet, the more it looks as if they're cooking up a story.

The truth doesn't need time. Fiction needs a lot.

Anonymous said...

The timing of this is suspicious, to say the least. Whatever happened to academic freedom? If Cathy McK. is allowed to sprew her hate then why should this guy be fired just for raising some issues?