Remember the feminist outrage (I know, I know -- adding "outrage" after the word "feminist" is superfluous -- how about we call it, "greater feminist outrage than usual"?) over the cases where men successfully used sleepwalking as a defense for rape? There were enraged hissy fits of incredulity, and every radical feminist -- even the many who likely had never seen a penis in person -- suddenly became an authority on the physical abilities of phalluses while their owners slept. "Not possible," they cried! "It's just another patriarchal excuse for men to rape!"
You see, Sexsomnia, like false rape claims, is a myth -- but rape trauma syndrome, suddenly recalled repressed memories of long ago rapes, the "fact" that it is common for women not to report a violent crime or not to report it until long after the act -- all those things must be accepted as Gospel Truth.
And every man who's been forced to sit through college orientation where the evils of maleness are graphically spelled out (while they wonder why in the hell they chose to attend college) knows that men can't use intoxication as a defense to rape. If both a man and a woman get drunk and decide to have sex, he's a rapist who might spend years in prison and thereafter be forced to register as a sex offender forever, and she's another rape victim -- even if she intended to get drunk and have sex, and even if she initiated the sex act.
One can only imagine how the screeching hens would react if a man tried to cite his prescription drug use as a defense to a rape charge.
In short, in this zero tolerance age for all things involving men and sex, no excuse for "rape" is deemed acceptable; men are expected to be in full control of their clear and rational faculties at all times even though women aren't. *******************************************************
Contrast that zero tolerance approach to men with the one that applies to women. Every exucse for not charging women with false reporting of rape is trotted out. Crystal Gail Mangum was too mentally deranged to charge, we were told -- only later did we see her graduate from college and write a book about her "rape."
And then there's this one from four years ago: Sacramento Sheriff's Deputy Lisa Gargano called a fellow deputy to report a man had broken into her home and attempted to rape her, according to sources. "The response was massive. A helicopter, K9 units, sexual assault detectives, sergeants, lieutenants, . . . and a throng of patrol units . . . sped to scene, according to the sources. They said one deputy was injured when he crashed his patrol car on his way there. A perimeter was established, and deputies combed the neighborhood in search of a suspect matching Gargano's description of her attacker. Deputies questioned and released a man who fit the description, one source said. But in the course of the investigation, detectives found no evidence to support Gargano's claims, according to two of the sources. She eventually told them she had been using prescription drugs, including the sleep-aid Ambien, and could have been hallucinating, the sources said."
Was Ms. Gargano charged with making a false rape report for the incident in question? Of course not. "Asked whether Gargano's actions could have been construed as making a false police report, [Sheriff] McGinness said there was no evidence to support such a charge. 'You'd have to have evidence to indicate that the suspect knowingly filed a false police report,' he said." In fact, Gargano was not even disciplined for her action.
Why was I thinking about Ms. Gargano today? Well, she's back in the news: "Gargano, now 37 and still a sheriff's deputy, was arrested this week on suspicion of driving under the influence of prescription drugs after police said she slammed her sport-utility vehicle into a Natomas Starbucks, injuring an elderly woman and an employee. She was off-duty at the time." Moreover: "Law enforcement sources said earlier this week that Gargano had been using prescription drugs for years, following several on-duty injuries. At least once, they said, department officials required her to attend a drug rehabilitation program."
Nice, isn't it? Now imagine the reaction of the radical feminist community if a rapist were excused from being charged because he'd been taking prescription drugs, and further imagine that several years later the man was involved in another criminal incident that he blamed on prescription drugs. Can anyone guess the feminist reaction?
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Prescription drugs excuse woman from making a false rape report
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
You know, sometimes we say of a false rape accuser -- "she's crazy!"
But in a way it's unfair to compare mentally ill people to false rape accusers. The vast majority of women and men who suffer from severe mental illness -- including the kinds that cause hallucinations -- never false accuse anybody of anything. A false rape accusation is a deliberate act intended to cause mayhem and gain attention, and mental illness is no excuse.
Right now the victim's family has to be wishing that this horrible woman had been locked up after her first crime! These criminals are very dangerous people.
On another topic, here are the hypocrites at feministing, slut-shaming a male out of office for discussing consensual sex: http://www.feministing.com/archives/017648.html
Only drunk college girls should have sexual freedom!
MENS REALITY QUIZ #2
Q: Why would any woman knowingly falsify a rape?
A: Because she can.
Anon at 2:02: the vast majority of women can but don't. Most women know it's wrong and would not do it.
Our problem is that far too many do it, and far too many let them.
Pierce,
Everything you just said in your follow up to my post is the same thing I said in my original post.
The word 'any' should not be misconstrued as 'all'. ;)
Anon, I think you make an excellent point -- it's very, very true. I was just emphasising the fact that not "all" do it.
Obviously not. But will the feminists ever admit that the vast majority of men never rape or batter?
The anon2:02 post was mine.
The anon3:47 post was not mine, but I couldn't have said it better.
IMHO, there is no excuse for false accusations.
Let me get this straight, this woman was given the famous " vagina pass " because she blamed her lie on prescription medication?
STAGGERS THE IMAGINATION!
false accusation by insanity?
hmph!
you have a typo in the post "exucse"
Can anyone guess the feminist reaction?
"Lock him up and throw away the key!"
"Castrate him!"
"Women never lie about rape!"
etc.........
On another topic, here are the hypocrites at feministing, slut-shaming a male out of office for discussing consensual sex: http://www.feministing.com/archives/017648.html
What they said had nothing to do with slut-shaming lol. Did you even read the comments? He's a conservative Family Values assemblyman who was caught bragging about his extra-marital affairs on a hot mic. If anything they were talking about the hyprocracy of it all. If you're going to throw around the phrase, know what it means first.
Only drunk college girls should have sexual freedom!
No, everyone should, but that should be pretty obvious. But maybe not.
Obviously not. But will the feminists ever admit that the vast majority of men never rape or batter?
Why would they need to? They know that the vase majority of men don't rape or abuse anybody.
About the topic. I'll break this up into 2 parts.
For one thing it is known that there is a code of "protecting your own" among the poice force.
Now, about sleepwalking as a defense for rape (I have never heard of this), I admit I was skeptical. But I looked it up and was shooked to find out that it's a real condition. I thought that you were joking in your use of the word "sexsomnia" (I didn't think it was a real word).
Anyway, hasn't there been research on repressed memories, especially in the case of adults who repressed memories of being raped and/or sexually abused as a child?
And rape trauma syndrome, why is it so unbelievable to you? I thought that there was research concerning this condition too.
I do believe that while it's not as common has it used to be, that it's not unheard of for a woman or girl to not report a rape, especially considering the automatic skepticism and judgment in some cases.
Last post: "shooked" is supposed to be "shocked"
Part 2
And every man who's been forced to sit through college orientation....knows that men can't use intoxication as a defense to rape.
Well, a person can't use intoxication as an excuse for injuring or killing someone with their car. And I can see prosecution going forward if the rapist was drunk and the victim wasn't and that person tried to fight him/her off. But I understand your grievance in the situation you mentioned of there being two drunk people instead of one.
Now is it possible to hallucinate while using prescription drugs, I'm pretty sure. With that being said if a person raped someone or hit/killed a person with a car while hallucinating due to prescription drugs, I wouldn't know what to think. Especially if those drugs were taken for a valid medical reason.
In the case of the woman who made a false rape report, it seems like the classic example of hallucination; of thinking that something or someone was there when nothing was. Now raping or driving while hallucinating, you don't hear that too often.
I think in this case, the officers and officials probably thought that since no one was actually arrested or physically hurt, her false rape claim wasn't THAT serious.
NOT saying that false rape accusations and reports aren't serious, I'm just talking about the possible reasoning behind this instance. I understand the main idea of this topic as being about the seemingly "zero tolerance" when it comes to rape and the sexes.
Then again, there always the idea of "protecting your own".
I don't know how I feel about this. It makes you think.
Sidenote here:
sit through college orientation where the evils of maleness are graphically spelled out
Really now??? If you're talking about crime statistics, I don't think that talking about it is meant to apply to the entire male gender or bash them as a whole.
But hey, this is probably taken from your personal experience or something you observed, and I'll consider that (*cough*wish what was reciprocated by some people*cough*).
Why would they need to? They know that the vase majority of men don't rape or abuse anybody.
LOL!
Also funny is how Renee thinks that sleepwalking is a valid defense for rape, but not that you were both drinking and she can't remember what happened, so it probably wasn't rape.
PLEASE do not respond to any posts from the username "Renee".
Also funny is how Renee thinks that sleepwalking is a valid defense for rape, but not that you were both drinking and she can't remember what happened, so it probably wasn't rape.
If you READ what I said, I said that I agree with what Pierce posted about a situation where there's 2 drunk people who BOTH decided to have sex. What exactly are you saying?
And the only thing I said about sexsomnia is that I never heard of it until this post. As for being used as a defense, if it's supported by evidence, then ok.
Anonymous said...
you have a typo in the post "exucse"
I haven't been sleeping well.
PLEASE do not respond to any posts from the username "Renee".
Post a Comment