Two months in prison. It took police eight weeks to check the surveillance cameras, which showed that Mr. Wheeler wasn't present at the restaurant. And again, why, other than to elicit sympathy, is the fact that she has four kids even mentioned? Perhaps, if the press would report, not editorialize, they wouldn't have a declining readership.
Rhetorical question, but shouldn't police gather evidence BEFORE arresting someone? At what point will we see the investigation occur before the arrest? Her word is all it took for a man to be locked up for two months. She gots twelve months. I hope she also loses custody of all of her children, for their safety.
12 month sentence for false rape accusation.
An innocent man spent two months in prison after his former lover staged her own abduction and falsely accused him of raping her.
Alison Welfare, 26, who has four children, was found by a cleaner on the floor of a McDonald's lavatory, semi-naked, bound and gagged, with her clothes torn and covered in paint. She told police that Christopher Wheeler, 38, a former boyfriend, had abducted her from a street in south-east London and held her at knifepoint before raping her. She claimed the attack followed sustained harassment.
Blackfriars Crown Court was told yesterday that Mr Wheeler spent eight weeks at High Down prison in Surrey before police discovered his accuser had made up the story.
Sentencing Welfare to 12 months in jail, the judge, Nicholas Valios QC, described it as a "worrying case".
He told her: "You embroiled a wholly innocent man in very serious allegations of rape, threats to kill and kidnap, and you spun a web of lies and deceit in order to bring about the arrest and, indeed, remand in custody of that innocent man for a period of two months. False allegations of this nature must be deterred. People who make these false allegations not only do great harm to those subjected to genuine sexual attacks, but to the criminal justice system itself."
Jennifer Knight, for the prosecution, said Welfare and Mr Wheeler, who are both deaf and from Orpington, Kent, met in February last year. Welfare first went to police in August 2002 and complained that Mr Wheeler had harassed her and sent her threatening mail.
Ten days after first going to the police, on 31 August, Welfare went to McDonald's in Peckham, south-east London, to set up the bogus rape attack.
Ms Knight told the court: "She was found in one of the cubicles half-naked with her clothes torn. She had been bound, gagged and her clothes torn and covered from head to toe with white paint ... She was dazed and distressed and taken to hospital."
Welfare told police she had been forced to stop by another car flashing its lights while she was driving in Orpington High Street and she had been shoved into a vehicle by two men. "She said a plastic bag had been pushed over her head and [she was] threatened with a knife," said Ms Knight.
Earlier that day she said she had received menacing text messages. But it turned out she had sent them to her phone from an internet café.
On 6 September Mr Wheeler was arrested and charged with rape, conspiracy to kidnap, making threats to kill and harassment. He was remanded in custody for two months and his case sent to the Old Bailey.
But police checked surveillance cameras and discovered that Welfare had gone into McDonald's on her own. Mr Wheeler was then released as Welfare was no longer a credible witness. She later admitted making up the allegations and pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice. She has no previous convictions.
Jocelyn Gibbs, for the defence, said Welfare had become pregnant by another man while in a relationship with Mr Wheeler and made the allegations "out of fear" that Mr Wheeler would take her baby.
Link: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/mother-imprisoned-for-false-rape-claim-against-her-exlover-535912.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
12 months is inadequate, but far better than the usual -- if she really does that much time.
Covering herself in paint was particularly stupid. You can die if your skin doesn't breathe.
"People who make these false allegations not only do great harm to those subjected to genuine sexual attacks, but to the criminal justice system itself."
Actually, no they don't. I fail to see how making a false allegation harms genuine victims. Can anyone explain that to me?
And exactly how is the criminal justice system "harmed"? The purpose of the system is to identify and punish the guilty. As long as it achieves that, it is not harmed. False accusers may attempt to harm the system by perverting the course of justice; but as long as they are exposed and punished, they fail and the system is seen to be working. However the system is harmed if the liars get away with it; but that takes a number of other people to be involved in the perversion - the police who fail to investigate properly or adjudge a man guilty by reason of having a penis; the lawyers who find every excuse for the inexcusable; and the judges who let lying and dangerous women off with a light tap. THEY are the people who harm the system.
And who really suffers the great harm? Why, the poor devil who gets locked up for two months, whose name is splashed across the local press as a rapist, and whose life is shredded. But hey, he's just a man, so that doesn't matter, does it? Presumably that's why the judge doesn't seem to care about the harm done to him.
paul parmenter
Is the woman really named "Alison Welfare"? That's hilarious.
"Is the woman really named "Alison Welfare"? That's hilarious."
I thought the same thing. Glad to see I'm not the only one who noticed that.
How it works here in the UK.
1/ "victim" makes complaint to police.
2/ specialist "systems" swing in to police, systems usually populated by self selecting people, which tends to reinforce the purpose of the system, eg more misandrists than misogynists get on to specialist rape teams.
3/ police arrest the "rapist" on SUSPICION of etc
4/ step 3 is to stop tampering with physical evidence, which is now gathered
5/ the interview / interrogation - if you do not have your specialist rape lawyer by your side, you just lost.
6/ this is the bit nobody gets, in the UK, the Police DO NOT DECIDE whether to charge you or not.
7/ the police take what they have so far, and go to the CPS, Crown Proscution Service
NB, up to this point, the police are looking to prove your guilt.
8/ the CPS is essentially a checklist, if your "score" is over what is literally known as the threshold, you get charged, if it is lower, you get police bailed. Police continue to work on the case either way.
NB, getting caught in even one lie, no matter how small, or seemingly irrelevant, puts you over the threshold
-------------------------------
The point you need to get here is that a damn sight sooner than you think, your liberty is decided by some low IQ police officer (nobody with any talent would take the job) inputting your data into a computer, where software as arbitrary as an internet personality test actually makes the decision whether or not you get charged or bailed at that time.
Anon for obvious reasons
I must also make the point.
The specialist rape lawyer.
(In UK slang often known as a "brief")
Having him sitting next to you during the interrogation is useful, in both by interrogations the attack dog feminist interrogator kept looking at my brief, seeing how far she could push things, eg her interpretation of my rights etc.
HOWEVER
Where your brief literally saves your ass is the confidential talk you have with him BEFORE your interrogation, where you tell him EVERYTHING, NO FUCKING LIES OR DECEPTIONS OR OMISSIONS, and he then advises you what to say in the interrogation.
=====================
IM(not so)HO
If you accept an interrogation without a specialist rape lawyer, or if you attempt to bullshit your specialist rape lawyer, you, literally, and I am not exagerrating for effect here, you literally might as well put your hands up and plead GUILTY to everyting you have been accused of.
Anon for obvious reasons
http://www.peevish.co.uk/slang/
Should be more clear "brief" is any solicitor or barrister who goes to the police station to aid you.
Police "you're going down for this mickey"
Mickey "my brief will get me out"
Anon for obvious reasons.
Must also make the point...
I got arrested on "Suspicion of committing rape" etc.
After 8 weeks No Further Action by Police, eg I walk away from it.
Since I was only arrested for SUSPICION of rape, I cannot sue for wrongful arrest... I was not arrested for rape.
This is the widely detested "sus" law, sus for suspicion.
To the arrested person, the differences between being arrested for rape, and arrested for suspicion of rape, are invisible.
Anon for obvious reasons.
Some false rape facts, for the 2% crowd.
In Scotland in 2007-8.
908 Rapes reported to police.
88 cases went to court.
33 cases resulted in a conviction.
What follow is STATISTICAL FACT.
1/
96.3% of all repoted rapes failed be "beyond reasonable doubt"
2/
92.3% of all reported rapes failed to even meet the "threshold" credibility test, a VERY lax test, in which even a single lie, no matter how seemingly irellevant or unrelated, will cause you to fail the test.
The oft quoted "2%" number is actually far closer to the number of rape accusations that are true, than to the number of rape accusations that are false.
Please note, these are actual, factual, official figures, and my statistical analysis is neither misleading, loaded, nor unfair in any way.
Anon for obvious reasons.
This situation is very similiar to my story with my husband's accuser. She has accused at least one other man in 2007 and was charged for making a false report. She was a minor at the time.
I am trying to find out who the accused was to get a statement from him to discredit her as a 'victim".
I have her full name and DOB. Where can I get this record? It needs to include her juvenille records. She was 17 at the time of her first false allegation. Anyone have any suggestions?
CBGirl
If she was a juvenile, the records are probably sealed and you would not be allowed to get them. I'm no lawyer, but I doubt that even a subpoena would be honored.
Big props to you for sticking by your husband and working so hard to get him cleared of this charge, CBGirl! It's too bad that women like you are so rare.
Thank you Anon 10:50
He cheated on me, he didn't committ a crime. I still may divorce him but I don't want him to spend his life in prison for cheating on me.
I do believe there has to be a way to get those records. This town is small (less than 10k in the county). One person finds out about her past and the whole county will know and the DA will most likely drop the charges.
The DA is a woman BTW....
Thanks for your support
CBGirl
Wow... Much respect CBGirl.
Looks like AOR (Anon for obvious reasons) has gotten really fired up.
However the information you just gave is priceless. There should really be a push for trying to get an reputable news organisation to present these stats EVEN IF it is only to open them up to "debunking" which would probably lead to real stats (which these may be, if so... scary) instead of the currently stated 2%.
"Jocelyn Gibbs, for the defence, said Welfare had become pregnant by another man while in a relationship with Mr Wheeler and made the allegations "out of fear" that Mr Wheeler would take her baby."
Yeah, right!
because men ALWAYS want some other guy's baby borne by their wives/girlfriends.
More likely the allegation were made to get back at him for dumping her when he found out she had cheated on him and gotten pregnant. [Hopefully one of the radical raunch-culture feminists from over at Amanda Hess's blog is reading - That makes her a SLUT, ladies!]
CBGirl - "I am trying to find out who the accused was to get a statement from him to discredit her as a 'victim"."
You will probably NOT be able to use any such statement in a court of law. It will most likely be excluded from consideration under the Rape Sheila Statues (in Colorado, for instance, there is a very high threshold for admitting prior false rape/sexual abuse claims - conviction of doing so in a court of law, AND a demonstrated pattern of making such false claims - virtually assuring that NO prior false rape claims will ever be admitted), although a understand that some states have become more "enlightened" WRT such prior claims.
Your best bet would be to get that other victims statement to the police. While I know that many here will jump down my throat for suggesting that the police be so engaged, I would observe that neither you nor this other victim are being charged with a crime.
Anyway, in my opinion, the best (and cheapest) way to deal with this matter is to try to head it off before it goes to trial. Providing the police with an alternative theory to investigate may well be the most effective way to get the truth out.
Post a Comment