Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Why modern feminism is illogical, unnecessary, and evil

Published on Psychology Today


By Satoshi Kanazawa

Although it is not Susan Pinker’s intention in writing it, reading her excellent book The Sexual Paradox: Troubled Boys, Gifted Girls and the Real Difference Between the Sexes cannot help but further reinforce my view that modern feminism in the 21st century is simultaneously illogical, unnecessary, and evil.

First, modern feminism is illogical because, as Pinker points out, it is based on the vanilla assumption that, but for lifelong gender socialization and pernicious patriarchy, men and women are on the whole identical. An insurmountable body of evidence by now conclusively demonstrates that the vanilla assumption is false; men and women are inherently, fundamentally, and irreconcilably different. Any political movement based on such a spectacularly incorrect assumption about human nature – that men and women are and should be identical – is doomed to failure.

Further, modern feminism is unnecessary, because its entire raison d’ĂȘtre is the unquestioned assumption that women are and have historically always been worse off than men. The fact that men and women are fundamentally different and want different things makes it difficult to compare their welfare directly, to assess which sex is better off; for example, the fact that women make less money than men cannot by itself be evidence that women are worse off than men, any more than the fact that men own fewer pairs of shoes than women cannot be evidence that men are worse off than women. However, in the only two biologically meaningful measures of welfare – longevity and reproductive success – women are and have always been slightly better off than men. In every human society, women live longer than men, and more women attain some reproductive success; many more men end their lives as total reproductive losers, having left no genetic offspring.

It is also not true that women are the “weaker sex.” Pinker documents the fact that boys are much more fragile, both physically and psychologically, than girls and hence require greater medical and psychiatric care. Men succumb to a larger number of diseases in much greater numbers than women do throughout their lives. The greater susceptibility of boys and men to diseases explains why more boys die in childhood and fail to reach sexual maturity and why men’s average life expectancy is shorter than women’s. This, incidentally, is the reason why slightly more boys than girls are born – 105 boys to 100 girls – so that there will be roughly 100 boys to 100 girls when they reach puberty.

Another fallacy on which modern feminism is based is that men have more power than women. Among mammals, the female always has more power than the male, and humans are no exception. It is true that, in all human societies, men largely control all the money, politics, and prestige. They do, because they have to, in order to impress women. Women don’t control these resources, because they don’t have to. What do women control? Men. As I mention in an earlier post, any reasonably attractive young woman exercises as much power over men as the male ruler of the world does over women.

Finally, modern feminism is evil because it ultimately makes women (and men) unhappy. In a forthcoming article in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania show that American women over the last 35 years have steadily become less and less happy, as they have made more and more money relative to men. Women used to be a lot happier than men despite the fact that they made much less money than men. The sex gap in happiness (in women’s favor) has declined in the past 35 years as the sex gap in pay (in men’s favor) narrowed. Now women make as much as, sometimes even more than, men do. As a result, today women are just as unhappy, or even more unhappy than, men are. As I explain in a previous post, money does not make women happy.

The feminist insistence that women behave like men and make as much money as men do may not be the sole reason for women’s rising levels of dissatisfaction with life; a greater incidence of divorce and single motherhood may also contribute to it. At any event, the culpability of modern feminism in making women steadily unhappy, because it is based on false assumptions about male and female human nature, is difficult to deny. Men’s happiness has not declined in the last 35 years, because there has not been masculinism; nobody has insisted on the radical notion that men are women, although, as Christina Hoff Sommers documents, this may be happening in our current war against boys. For anyone who is looking for an effective antidote to modern feminism, I highly recommend Danielle Crittenden’s 1999 book What Our Mothers Didn't Tell Us: Why Happiness Eludes the Modern Women

10 comments:

Norm said...

this is okay, but I think she's wrongly interpreting some of the research. For example, she says,

"Among mammals, the female always has more power than the male"

The fact is that relations between the sexes are not about power, at least with regard to human beings. She may be referring to the fact that women are the 'limiting factor' in reproduction, but that does not translate into power at a social level, which is how people normally think of it.

Also, saying boys are 'fragile' is a pejorative term and is too vague as well. Men are in fact generally tougher than women in at least some ways - they have to be, in order to complete in the male dominance hierarchy.

Norm said...

in the above, I should have added that boys must compete in the dominance hierarchy as well. It starts at a very young age.

Norm said...

"Men’s happiness has not declined in the last 35 years"

How exactly are they measuring happiness?

Also not the focus on women's happiness in the latter part of the article. This is another example of how society is more concerned about women than men.

Actually, I think this same guy wrote a book called 'Why Beautiful People Have More Kids' or something like that. My initial take on him is that he's a tad flaky, though at least he's on the right path.

One should never rely on popular publications such as Psychology Today. For example, Steve Moxon's "The Woman Racket" is a much better source.

Norm said...

the above should say "also NOTE the focus on women's happiness.

whew. four entries in a row!

Anonymous said...

Modern feminism is actually based on the contradictory beliefs that women are both equal to men in every way and yet also both morally superior and disadvantaged just by virtue of being female. Women are equal to men only when it is convenient and are born victims the rest of the time.

The Archivist said...

"Men’s happiness has not declined in the last 35 years"

How exactly are they measuring happiness?




Norm,

Considering how far marriage rates have dropped, and how the number of divorces is at about 55%, I would say that men are much less happy (generally).

I would say that with the advent of 3rd wave feminism, EVERYONE is less happy.

Well done feminists. You acheived equality. Everyone is equally depressed.

Renee said...

From what I've experienced (not much) in regards to feminism online, I've never really encountered any feminists who said that men and women were the same biologically. Their main concerns deal with sociological issues. Then again, that's MY experience. I don't know any feminist personally in real life though.

But anyway, I don't think they're THAT bad. Yes there are flaws in their ideas, but I give them credit for speaking out on society's and the media's own flaws. Well, then again you don't really have to be a feminist to do that. But I guess since they, for the most part, are aware of how women are and have been viewed, percieved, believed to be, etc., not to mention social practices and ideas in regard to women, they (or at least the ones I've read from) are able to point out and see sociological issues that should be adressed. Like what you all do and other MRA sites do in regards to men. He claims that "Feminism is the radical notion that women are men". I don't see it that way at all. They're not trying to "be men".

Also, from what I have read, Satoshi writes really...I don't know...questionable material. Like how men are more intelligent than women because they are taller, and that taller people are more intelligent than shorter people. He also claims that aesthetically attractive people are more intelligent than "unattractive" people.

Now whether that's true, I highly doubt it, but I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and read his other articles.

Renee said...

I have a question. I read a comment from a site that basically said it's not so much that feminism caused women to be more unhappy, but that it seems that women are more unhappy in this day and age because them feel free to be more honest about their feelings than women of years past.

The author never considers that women in the 1960's may have simply REPORTED being happier than they in fact were, given the social stigma of admitting dissatisfaction with a domestic lifestyle. After all, THAT'S WHY IT WAS PROBLEM WITH NO NAME - because no one talked about it. I would argue that women today feel more freedom to respond honestly about how happy they actually feel.

In addition, women likely have higher expectations for themselves today than they did in the past, given the wider variety of opportunities available. This in turn may lead to that kind of positive or productive dissatisfaction that propels you forward to reach for more in your life. But it also means that when you take a snapshot of the female population at any one time, you will find a greater incidence of such "unhappiness." But I don't think it's at all a bad thing to have fewer women stuck at home working hard to convince themselves, "This is enough; this makes me happy"...


Just in case, she's saying that there should be few stay at home moms, just that some of them shouldn't convence themselves that is what they want when in fact it isn't. And yes, I am aware that it could be true that women back then reported to have been happy simply because they were.

Just something to think about.

Anonymous said...

UK: "When feminism went nuts"

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/article6739270.ece

off topic

Wife's Successful Hitman Attempt on Hubby a Hoax

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/weird/Wifes-Hitman-Dream-Turns-Into-Nightmare--52535712.html

Norm said...

Archivist,

I agree, men are a lot less happy. When the author speaks as if they are not, I think he is just echoing his own thought that women are 'more more-unhappy'. You know, in one since you could almost call this guy a chivalrist.

I've come to believe that these guys with their recent research feel pangs of guilt when they report the news that there ARE differences between the sexes, so they feel the need to suck up to women in order to compensate. Evolutionary psychologist David Buss strikes me as being one of that type.

That's why I always recommend Moxon, becuase he is totally un-p.c. In fact, he scientifically debunks feminism itself.