One of my favorite false rape claim stories from the past year involves a woman named Deborah Davies. In fact, due to six little words Deborah uttered, she has my vote for Poster Child for false rape claim.You see, Deborah is a living manifestation of the vacuity, the downright falsity of the feminist mantra that rape claims should not be viewed with suspicion because it deters some women from reporting rape.
According to the news story: When Deborah was "arrested for perverting the course of justice the 35-year-old brazenly said: 'That's why women don't report rape.' But having maintained her innocence during four interviews, she then admitted her lies when confronted with all the flaws in her story and claimed she did it because she 'wanted some attention.'"
Read it again. Savor it. Celebrate the irony. A false rape accuser is parroting the feminist mantra that when police question the veracity of a rape accuser and find it wanting, that deters real rape claimants from "coming forward."
Deborah is living proof that the mantra is typical gender feminist bullshit, concocted out of a loathing for approximately one-half the population of planet earth.
Deborah is living proof that the opposite of the mantra must be applied -- police must question the veracity of a women's complaint of rape, and that if they fail to consider the possibility that she may be intentionally lying, they aren't doing their job.
Deborah is living proof that when the mantra is applied in the real world, there is a real possibility that criminals, like Deborah, will get away with their crimes.
And actual rape victims should be outraged by the fact that people like Deborah arrogate unto themselves the mantle of victimhood -- a mantle that feminists insanely want to use to cover every woman who cries rape, instead of just every woman who actually is raped.
And therein, ladies and gentlemen, lies the problem.
Posts
29 comments:
When Deborah was "arrested for perverting the course of justice the 35-year-old brazenly said: 'That's why women don't report rape.
scott says..Thats exactly right, charging false rape accusers would deter their false rape accusations.
Enabling false rape accusers is a perversion of justice.
Better stop prosecuting for false insurance claims -- real victims of fires might stop filing.
Personally, I find it not surprising at all that she's giving everyone the "up yours" sign.
That poster wasn't used to promote false rape claims, though. That's Rosie the Riveter, and she was an honorable part of the struggle to win WWII.
And every time you see any presentation about World War II, where incredible numbers of young men paid the ultimate price, we are subjected to Rosie the Riveter, as if we can't tell "the whole story" without mentioning women's miniscule "sacrifice."
Their sacrifice was a worthy one. Those were very different times. Those women put the needs of their country aheaad of their own -- something modern feminists would never do. Do you think the honies at feministing.com would go work in a factory while their men went off to war, and then give up their factory jobs when their men returned? Never. With the modern feminists it's nothing but me, me, me! And to hell with the truth, to hell with men, to hell with the needs of their own children.
Speaking of feministing, did anybody read this post by beebee08? http://community.feministing.com/2009/06/specific-intiatives-to-prevent.html
She says that in her high school, 50 Latina girls got pregnant prior to graduation. She says that she wished that more education programs were in place to teach these young girls not to get pregnant.
Shall we let her in on the secret? THEY NEED A FATHER.
The women who went into the factories were the mothers of these banshees. The latter had to learn it somewhere . . . .
Modern feminism didn't arrive until modern appliances reduced the burden of housework, leaving women with more time to bitch. It is a myth that feminism "liberated" women -- in reality, women were freed from burdensome housework by technology, and only started complaining afterwards.
These banshees have been indoctrinated.
hey, scott (and all his other aliases):
I think we all get the point. Please contribute something original or move on.
Anonymous said...
" Their sacrifice was a worthy one. Those were very different times. Those women put the needs of their country aheaad of their own -- something modern feminists would never do. Do you think the honies at feministing.com would go work in a factory while their men went off to war, and then give up their factory jobs when their men returned? "
IF they have husbands. If they have husbands, they more than likely assault,belittle,abuse and threaten them with any type of accusation(s) they can come up with to keep them under their control. As far as making scrifices, they only make sacrifices for themselves and their " divas ".
" Never. With the modern feminists it's nothing but me, me, me! And to hell with the truth, to hell with men, to hell with the needs of their own children. "
The only children they might care about are their daughter whom they can train ,or program, to be feminists in the future.
Anonymous said...
" THEY NEED A FATHER. "
True and correct.
Norm says
"hey, scott (and all his other aliases):
I think we all get the point. Please contribute something original or move on."
Scott say..when did you become the big mouth around here telling others to move on??
Political activism often involves repeating the same tired old slogans, until everybody gets it. Just look at the feminists. They've pretty much taken over society. How often do they say anything that they haven't already said a million times?
And every time you see any presentation about World War II, where incredible numbers of young men paid the ultimate price, we are subjected to Rosie the Riveter, as if we can't tell "the whole story" without mentioning women's miniscule "sacrifice."
I find this completely insulting! Women did their part during the war, a very important part. Without women working the performing the jobs that other men or their husbands did, the economy...everything would be at a stand-still. I mean, who would go to work? And also, I'm pretty sure that some of the jobs they did actually provided equipment for the war. All you need to do is google women and their contributions during WWII.
And I'm sure that if women "told the whole story" of something without mentioning men's contributions and issues, then you, whoever you are, would be in an uproar.
"when did you become the big mouth around here telling others to move on??"
After over a year of reading your ad-nauseum same two comments - on other MRA sites as well.
But congratulations, at least your question above is something original from you (...isn't it?)
"I'm sure that if women "told the whole story" of something without mentioning men's contributions and issues, then you, whoever you are, would be in an uproar."
You mean like when today's feminists never acknowledge the contributions to their movement that men have made in the past?
"I'm sure that if women "told the whole story" of something without mentioning men's contributions and issues, then you, whoever you are, would be in an uproar."
The reality is that the world would come to a fucking standstill if men went on strike - in fact women would start dying that very day. Of course, Renee and her feminist sisters would find that FACT completely insulting, so men are never allowed to tell the whole story.
I agree, and it is totally hilarious to hear women talking about "hey, look what would happen if we all went on strike!"
Especially the blue collar guys. For example, how would things look if all the MEN at the major utilities in New York and Los Angeles took off for a day?
Norm, i hate to be mean to you, but you're kinda asking for it. You're comments are simpleton at best.
Hey, now, guys. Both Norm and Scott are regular contributors and we value their contributions. Not every anybody writes here -- especially me -- is going to hit a homerun every time. Norm's comments rank high on the intelligence scale.
As for repitition, I don't mind it because I keep track of where our readers are coming from -- on any given day, we have a ton of people who've never been to our site before, and to them, a comment that Scott might have made previously elsewhere is brand new.
The reality is that the world would come to a fucking standstill if men went on strike - in fact women would start dying that very day. Of course, Renee and her feminist sisters would find that FACT completely insulting, so men are never allowed to tell the whole story.
Why overreact and talk about striking? Maybe "uproar" was too strong a word. Anyway, my comment was about how you (men) wouldn't like it if a story/event/etc. was told without the mention of men's contribution or the contribution was considered miniscule. Just because they weren't in the front lines fighting doesn't mean that women's contributions during the war or anything should be disregarded and forgotten. The two really shouldn't be compared.
Oh and I actually don't consider myself a feminist. Do I agree with them on some things, yes. And some things I disagree with. But I don't think that they're responsible for every single thing that's wrong with our country. I don't consider them evil, and many times some of the issues they bring to light, complaints, and analysis are valid and important. Just like you guys.
The feminists aren't responsible for every single thing that's wrong with our country -- but this blog isn't about every single thing that's wrong with our country.
Whether or not you want to call them evil, it's fair to say that they're extremely dishonest and self-absorbed, and that they couldn't care less about the harm that they inflict.
As for the idea of a men's strike, that really would be pointless -- if we ever got that many men to even care about our issues then there would be no need for a strike. Get just half a million men to contribute regularly to a vigorous men's rights organization and this whole mess will turn around in no time.
I see your point. I shouldn't have made such a general statement. It's just that anytime someone (not here) complains about feminism, they blame just about anything on them.
It isn't just feminism. It's also chivalrism. If men weren't a part of the problem then there wouldn't be a problem.
If anyone's interested in contributing, check out Fathers and Families (go to Glenn Sacks' blog - www.glennsacks.com)
You can contribute financially (no minimum) and/or with activm which they regularly do - much of it involves sending emails.
Despite the name, it helps all men, no just fathers. Also, Warren Farrell has predicted that the fathers' rights movement will achieve the first major success on the road to men's rights, and if you think about it, he's probably right.
the above should say "with activism"
Glenn and those folks have done some great work.
Post a Comment