As most who visit here are aware, we see cases where predominantly, it is a woman leveling false rape accusations. The following story is just the opposite. We have a case of a man leveling the false accusation, who was sentenced to 8 months in jail for the accusation.
The judge in the case makes a very relevant and valid point:
“When false complaints are made they undermine the confidence of juries in the evidence of those who are making true complaints.”
Now, if that could be applied to ALL false accusers, along with the sentence handed down, maybe we could see a drop in false accusations, and an increase in prosecutions of true rapists.
Craig Cullen jailed for false rape accusation.
AN INNOCENT man fainted when he was arrested at work and had to spend a night in the cells after another man falsely accused him of rape.
The unnamed man, who had never been arrested before, had to explain to his boss why he was being arrested before being taken to the police station where he was fingerprinted, questioned, and photographs and samples of DNA were taken.
Craig Cullen, 22, was jailed for eight months for the false and malicious claim that he had been raped by a man in a house at Nantgarw near Pontypridd.
Rachel Knight, prosecuting at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court, said that Cullen told police he was gay and gave a detailed “account” to police, describing how he had been collected from his place of work on February 24 this year and they had gone back to the man’s house.
The two, he said, had only met three times before and there had been some intimate contact, but that they had never had sex until he was raped.
Cullen claimed the man pinned him down on the bed as he raped him.
He told officers that his “attacker” had then shut him in the house, locking the doors and windows, before he returned to take him home in the early hours of the morning.
Cullen claimed that he could not call for help because he did not have a phone but when he was dropped off he made a complaint to a friend and he was taken to the specialised suite in Merthyr Tydfil.
His “attacker”, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was arrested at work and had to explain to his bosses the reason for the arrest.
“He appeared distraught and fainted,” said Ms Knight.
“He said that he had done nothing wrong.
“He said that Cullen was being malicious because he had discovered that things had been taken and there had been an argument before taking the defendant back home.”
He was fingerprinted, DNA tested and questioned and spent seven and a half hours in custody before being released.
Police later discovered that not only was there another person in the house at the time of the alleged assault, but that it was impossible to lock all the doors and windows.
“As a result of the investigation it was not possible that the defendant’s account could be true,” said Ms Knight.
Stephen Thomas, defending Cullen, of Albert Street, Newport, told the court that he knew he had committed a serious offence, hence the guilty plea.
“That in itself is an important factor in sparing the victim from any further trauma,” said Mr Thomas.
He said that Cullen, who admitted perverting the course of public justice, had sent an apologetic text message to his victim and added: “This was an aberration, a one-off offence.”
Jailing Cullen, Judge John Curran said that it had been a malicious and false complaint that had caused damage to a person and his liberty and told him: “When false complaints are made they undermine the confidence of juries in the evidence of those who are making true complaints.”
Link: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/2009/05/28/eight-months-jail-for-false-rape-claim-man-91466-23716270/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
A good example of the effect of a false rape claim -- the accused fainted. I don't think people realize how devastating it would be to have the police come into your workplace and make such an accusation. And then to have to tell you boss!
The feminists who support believing any rape accusation would prefer almost any fate to the one suffered by this victim. Things are being done to men that women would never tolerate being done to themselves.
"Things are being done to men that women would never tolerate being done to themselves." That's right -- all in the name of fighting the "more important" war on rape.
Which is really just a war for female privilege. Feminism is supposed to be about women achieving equality, but it's really about protecting women from the responsibilities of equality with men.
This site, and it compilation of false rape claims, is a historic event.
What would really be historic would be restoring a presumption of innocence for defendents.
"This site, and it compilation of false rape claims, is a historic event."
I agree. When people find out false accusors are being exposed in the public domain, we'll definitely draw a lot of attention (though most of it hostile - I would even expect lawsuits).
" Anonymous said...
What would really be historic would be restoring a presumption of innocence for defendents. "
In my honest opinion, what would be historic, would be forcing the powers that be with adhering stricly in accordance with OUR U.S. Constitution. Which I do believe the Bill Of Rights is an important part. I mentioned the nith amendment in a past post. This is it in full context:
U.S. Constitution: Ninth Amendment
Ninth Amendment - Unenumerated Rights
Amendment Text | Annotations
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment09/
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
" This we'll defend "
motto of the U.S Army
" Archivist said...
"Things are being done to men that women would never tolerate being done to themselves." That's right -- all in the name of fighting the "more important" war on rape. "
Also to fuel the feminist and media hysteria concerning violence ,real and imagined, against women.
That is another war declared against all men
Post a Comment